Re: proposals without much pushback

I'll add Srinivas' proposal to this list.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0033.html

Christopher Ferris wrote:
> 
> I scanned the mail archives for any proposals for changes
> to the draft requirements document and found these below.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0021.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0030.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0031.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0000.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0446.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0459.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0435.html
> 
> I also didn't see a whole lot of pushback or even wild and
> enthusiastic support in the form of +1 emails.
> 
> I will add these to the agenda of the f2f next week. Hopefully,
> we can dispose of these quickly.
> 
> In the meanwhile, please take a moment to review the proposals
> (and any follow-up if any) and feel free to indicate your
> support or concerns.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 15:07:25 UTC