www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from September 2001 by thread

No. Russell Nelson (Monday, 1 October)

Opposed To Patents In Web Standards A. Chavan (Monday, 1 October)

Please keep the WWW free Ovidiu Gheorghioiu (Monday, 1 October)

Opposed To Patents In Web Standards A. Chavan (Monday, 1 October)

failure to communicate Branden Robinson (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Chris Leyon (Monday, 1 October)

In opposition to RAND licenses Steven Barker (Monday, 1 October)

I concur with Alan Cox Branden Robinson (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Responds Adam Warner (Monday, 1 October)

Comment on draft W3C Patent Policy Framework Andrew Pam (Monday, 1 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Masatake E. Hori (Monday, 1 October)

Commment on patent changes Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO (Monday, 1 October)

No to RAND Matthew Bielanski (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Mark Tearle (Monday, 1 October)

Impact on existing WG's Bob Cunnings (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Bad Boddhisatva Troutwaxer (Monday, 1 October)

Patents and royalties are the antithesis of the Web's openness The Nose Who Knows (Monday, 1 October)

The proposed policy is bad news John F. Nixon (Monday, 1 October)

RF > RAMMED * Deadline extension? * W3C should serve the PUBLIC interest John Gilmore (Monday, 1 October)

Comments on proposed patent policy John F. Sowa (Monday, 1 October)

W3C patent policy Margaret Leber (Monday, 1 October)

RAND license *is* discriminatory... Becky Kearns (Monday, 1 October)

Proposed RAND Policy Robin Snader (Monday, 1 October)

Atrong opposition Vincent Crespi (Monday, 1 October)

Please keep patents out of standards! Anders S. Buch (Monday, 1 October)

RAND licensing of "patented standards" will kill the web Mike Warnecke (Monday, 1 October)

Keep patent policy as it is (please) John William Dalton (Monday, 1 October)

RAND E L Tonkin (Monday, 1 October)

I oppose RAND Steve Yurman (Monday, 1 October)

Opposed to Patent Policy Kenn Munro (Monday, 1 October)

new patent policy geo (Monday, 1 October)

Stop This Christopher Felton (Monday, 1 October)

Proposed RAND licensing model - AGAINST Charles Sullivan (Monday, 1 October)

RAND: Working Group comment requested Gervase Markham (Monday, 1 October)

I hope you realise Irise Lenoir (Monday, 1 October)

RAND versus freedom Jonathon Sim (Monday, 1 October)

Proposed new RAND Policy Russ Magee (Sunday, 30 September)

Permit _ONLY_ royalty-free working groups in the W3C! David Wheeler (Monday, 1 October)

Royalty-Free should be required Kevin Dangoor (Monday, 1 October)

The concept of RAND is in itself discriminatory James Young (Monday, 1 October)

Anti-User RAND Licensing Policy Bill Gunn (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Hurts Everyone Michael Greminger (Monday, 1 October)

NO patents in standards Tony Sellers (Monday, 1 October)

RAND policy Tim Krieglstein (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Tim Holy (Monday, 1 October)

I do not agree with RAND b (Monday, 1 October)

Allowing patents in Standards is the antithesis of the W3C charter Erik Trimble (Monday, 1 October)

Proposed W3C Patent Policy Wes McDermott (Monday, 1 October)

RAND, Accessibility, and the Digital Divide JP Schnapper-Casteras (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy Gary C (Monday, 1 October)

Patents and the W3C Seth Johnson (Monday, 1 October)

Comment on RAND patent implementation Judyth Mermelstein (Monday, 1 October)

Objections to RAND. Jose Fandos (Monday, 1 October)

All Recommendations should be royalty-free James Clark (Monday, 1 October)

comments on: W3C Considers Royalty-Bound Patents In Web Standards John (EBo) David (Monday, 1 October)

Patent owners should fend for themselves. Ben Crowell (Monday, 1 October)

RAND will hurt the W3C and the Internet. G. Edward Johnson (Monday, 1 October)

Comment on patent policy proposal w3c-comment@terc.edu (Monday, 1 October)

RAND comment Don (Monday, 1 October)

Patents are dangerous to open standards Chris (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed Patent Pollicy Framework JP Glutting (Monday, 1 October)

Adoption of recommendations Johan Bager (Monday, 1 October)

Some thoughts about standards (short) JKelly (Monday, 1 October)

Please don't allow patents to monopolize SW / the web. Richard Ames (Monday, 1 October)

Objection to patent policy Anselm Hook (Monday, 1 October)

A few further points Zak McGregor (Monday, 1 October)

Commentary on Patent Policy Geoff Depew (Monday, 1 October)

Who pays? Andrew Williams (Monday, 1 October)

Reflection Bill Evans (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Will Janoschka (Monday, 1 October)

Negative Comments Chris Herron (Monday, 1 October)

Against W3 PATENT POLICY Jim Zellmer (Monday, 1 October)

A terrible idea Richard Hillesley (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment: Against. John Panzer (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Adrian Harte (Monday, 1 October)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Gardner Neely (Monday, 1 October)

incorporating patented technology in W3 standards David Casti (Monday, 1 October)

Against Patents in Standards Pat Mahoney (Monday, 1 October)

Please let webstandards be freely implementable by ALL Jonas Sicking (Monday, 1 October)

I oppose RAND Gardner Neely (Monday, 1 October)

Rand Comments Susan (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy Framework - bad move Richard West (Monday, 1 October)

RAND uglyness Jim Bauer (Monday, 1 October)

Patent encumbrance of standards unwise in international relations Dale Pontius (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Paul Logston (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy D Tuinstra (Monday, 1 October)

Any fee is discriminatory Mats Palmgren (Monday, 1 October)

W3C Patent Policy Simon Hill (Monday, 1 October)

I oppose the W3C's proposed change in patent policy. Greg Johnson (Monday, 1 October)

Opinion on the RAND license Mats Palmgren (Monday, 1 October)

NO PATENTS in STANDARDS massey (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment re. allowing patented technologies Jan C. Zawadzki (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Mats Palmgren (Monday, 1 October)

Opposition To Rand Douglas Goodwin (Sunday, 30 September)

Regarding the RAND license... Mats Palmgren (Monday, 1 October)

RAND proprosal hugh d fegely (Monday, 1 October)

patented standards smokedjam (Monday, 1 October)

On Allowing RAND licensing to be used by W3C standards Steve Smith (Monday, 1 October)

patent policy comment Jonathan Mark (Monday, 1 October)

RAND Frederick R. Hanhisalo (Monday, 1 October)

It doesn't make sense, it isn't fair, and it's regressive Jerry Asher (Monday, 1 October)

patent policy beasley (Monday, 1 October)

About the RAND license x (Monday, 1 October)

Reject this proposal A Seaman (Monday, 1 October)

W3C patent policy Eben Moglen (Monday, 1 October)

Regarding RAND license... x (Monday, 1 October)

noncommercial perspective Michael C. Gilbert (Monday, 1 October)

Comment Submission for the W3C's Patent Policy Group N2URO@aol.com (Monday, 1 October)

Submarine patents Douglas Brebner (Monday, 1 October)

RAND license sucks x (Monday, 1 October)

W3C is a pawn in an IT Cartel Kelvin Param (Monday, 1 October)

World Wide Web, RAND, and people without a lot of money Jeffrey W. Baker (Monday, 1 October)

Regarding the patent policy recommendation. Rod Mckenzie (Monday, 1 October)

I am against this policy Slater, Christopher M (Monday, 1 October)

Patent Policy Damien Miller (Monday, 1 October)

Patent policy Ron Nath (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND risks to set W3.org out of play M U Borchorst (Sunday, 30 September)

Please, no patented material in W3C standards Seth Delackner (Sunday, 30 September)

stop them from crashing the RAND fee plane on the free software towers Pierre BRUA (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing is a bad idea Antaeus Feldspar (Sunday, 30 September)

Fee-bound patents dan (Sunday, 30 September)

Allowance of RAND in standards Brian Ashe (Sunday, 30 September)

No No No. Remember what W3C stands for Ken Yap (Sunday, 30 September)

WTC wasn't enough? parse@earthlink.net (Sunday, 30 September)

no RAND Landahl, Bill (Sunday, 30 September)

No to RAND Dennis Sosnoski (Sunday, 30 September)

Response to RAND - negative Neil Timms (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND clause and W3C's mission Daniel L Speyer (Sunday, 30 September)

NO to new RAND proposal! david (Sunday, 30 September)

Please keep web standards royalty free Todd C. Miller (Sunday, 30 September)

Please don't do this Doug Dew (Sunday, 30 September)

This is a bad policy TopXML - Mark Wilson (Sunday, 30 September)

For shame! Walt Leipold (Sunday, 30 September)

Will we choose profits at the expense of our students? Mike Baptiste (Sunday, 30 September)

NO to RAND patents Marc Espie (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed RAND Licensing Terms David Northover (Monday, 1 October)

utterly wrong Samantha Atkins (Sunday, 30 September)

Re: Advice to lengthen the time to respond to the RAND licencing issue Brian Marick (Sunday, 30 September)

I am concerned about allowing RAND licensing Dan York (Sunday, 30 September)

Do Not Adopt The Patent Policy Bernie@Hoefer.trw.com (Sunday, 30 September)

Vote NO on RAND Patents Christian Mogensen (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C and patents Christian Langreiter (Sunday, 30 September)

I strongly object to the proposed policy of allowing patented technologies to be used in W3C standards definition Pete Black (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Nathan (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy comments tbreuel@parc.xerox.com (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing: bad proposal, insufficient consultation Olivier Zendra (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing Forrest Sweasy (Sunday, 30 September)

against accomodating patents David McCusker (Sunday, 30 September)

Opposed to new draft of policy Jeremy Scrivener (Sunday, 30 September)

Even the idea is absurd... Johan Landström (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND (www patent policy) standards David O'Brien (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND is bad for everyone Roberto Mello (Sunday, 30 September)

Royalty-Bound Patents Christopher Baker (Sunday, 30 September)

Please extend the comment deadline Theo de Raadt (Sunday, 30 September)

Fee based web standard john (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments on the draft. Franck Coppola (Sunday, 30 September)

Patented recommendations Dave Lacy Kusters (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licences: don\'t act unresponsibly and cowardly baptiste13@altern.org (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on "reasonable and non-discriminatory" patent system Ryan Myers (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed Changes in W3C patent policy Mike Brodbelt (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND KevinO (Sunday, 30 September)

Les brévets et les standarts Oleg (Sunday, 30 September)

No matter what, make RAND free for Free Open Source software Norman Megill (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy Nathan Tuck (Sunday, 30 September)

On the proposed patent policy of the W3C Gareth McCaughan (Sunday, 30 September)

Against RAND proposal MJ Ray (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND shane (Sunday, 30 September)

Against RAND pelegrin@labri.fr (Sunday, 30 September)

Please don't do it. Homer Matthew Smith (Sunday, 30 September)

Re RAND licensing George Vagenas (Sunday, 30 September)

This policy is wrong John Beimler (Sunday, 30 September)

Deeply concerned about the possible change of accepted IPR policy Daniel Veillard (Sunday, 30 September)

change in standards policy Josh Walgenbach (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Comment David H. Silber (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments about Fee-based Standards for the Web nicolas.fugier@laposte.net (Sunday, 30 September)

No good can come of this. Please reject this proposal! Elliot Glaysher (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Will Discredit W3C Andreas Pour (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing Neil Kandalgaonkar (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Cameron Kellough (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND would stifle innovation and hurt consumer choice Shawn Balestracci (Sunday, 30 September)

Loosening requirements for patented technologies Milton Henry (Sunday, 30 September)

Even current standards are not safe! Gervase Markham (Sunday, 30 September)

Strongly disagree with proposal to allow non-royalty-free standards Jean Pierre LeJacq (Sunday, 30 September)

Brief words regarding RAND, capital, and non-capital economies Adam Megacz (Sunday, 30 September)

Public comment system flawed, deadline should be extended reed mideke (Sunday, 30 September)

patent free web Calvin (Sunday, 30 September)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Miguel Angel López (Saturday, 29 September)

W3C "RAND" Patent Policy Framework draft Karsten M. Self (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Tim Sweeney (Sunday, 30 September)

Royalty-Bound Patents Julian Coombes (Sunday, 30 September)

Speech freedom menaced Xabi Ochotorena (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy Josef Schneider (Sunday, 30 September)

Commercial impact of the proposed W3C patent policy. Riehl, Jonathan (Jonathan) (Sunday, 30 September)

Public Comment RAND Steven Kang (Sunday, 30 September)

Please don't Jesper Juhl (Saturday, 29 September)

World Wide Web is International Carsten Ziepke (Sunday, 30 September)

Don't do it! Michael Schaefer (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Robin Mead (Sunday, 30 September)

Please, reject RAND Enrique Baraibar (Sunday, 30 September)

Does W3C yearn for the bad old days...? Mikko Rauhala (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Comment Michal Politowski (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on RAND Bryan McCormick (Sunday, 30 September)

What's wrong? These companies can't compete on their own. Richard Suematsu (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C's Patent policy sbalneav@e-brz.com (Sunday, 30 September)

comments against martin f krafft (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Gerald T. Hewes (Sunday, 30 September)

Opposition to Patent Policy George Toft (Sunday, 30 September)

Re: Fee-based standards for the web Victoria Helms (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy Hilmar Berger (Sunday, 30 September)

WWW death Rafael Avila de Espindola (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND considered harmful Scott Maxwell (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments On The W3C Patent Policy Framework Draft Florian Weimer (Sunday, 30 September)

Fairness Paul S. & Germaine K. Mitchell (Sunday, 30 September)

No patents for W3C technology. Kevin A. Burton (Sunday, 30 September)

Please avoid patented standards, even "RAND" Julian Morrison (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy draft severely flawed Aaron Swartz (Sunday, 30 September)

A terrible idea Richard Thrippleton (Sunday, 30 September)

No. This opens the door to corruption. Christopher Ramey (Saturday, 29 September)

"Reasonable" is a slipperly slope Mike Linksvayer (Sunday, 30 September)

The idea stinks. Patrick Logan (Sunday, 30 September)

comments on the working draft David Wragg (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND policy Steve Jorgensen (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposal to allow patent-bound WWW standards Smitty (Sunday, 30 September)

NO TO PATENT STANDARDS. Farboj (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND is a bad idea Dave Bauer (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents would stunt evolution of the web Branen Salmon (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent and Standards Daniel Boos (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing and the future of W3C Rufus Polson (Sunday, 30 September)

About standards and limitations Guillermo S. Romero (Sunday, 30 September)

Royalties in patents used in standards Kiran Wagle (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments on your Patent Policy Tom Forsythe (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment Andy Scholz (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Zavier Sheran (Sunday, 30 September)

LT: NO to W3C RAND Proposal T. Thompson (Sunday, 30 September)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Kristoffer Ekelund (Sunday, 30 September)

no! Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (Sunday, 30 September)

Say No to RAND Josh Sandberg (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Glenn Crocker (Sunday, 30 September)

Should drop RAND, or re-open public discussion John Robert Boynton (Sunday, 30 September)

Please don't allow patents into standards Matthew Boulos (Sunday, 30 September)

comments on your patent policy Graydon Hoare (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C - Please preserve the Web! Noah S (Sunday, 30 September)

Ill-Advised Patent Policy Matt Benjamin (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy Jo Dillon (Monday, 1 October)

Objections to proposed patent policy sinster@ballistictech.net (Sunday, 30 September)

Incorporating patented technology in W3C standards is a bad idea Evelio Perez-Albuerne (Sunday, 30 September)

Against a patent encumbered internet. David Gould (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing inappropriate for web technologies Chase Tingley (Sunday, 30 September)

Don't do RAND Stephen Moore (Sunday, 30 September)

No room for patents in standards Robert J. Berger (Sunday, 30 September)

Leaving the W3C Nile Geisinger (Sunday, 30 September)

Microsoft patenting the WWW ??? Aaron R. Kulkis (Sunday, 30 September)

Strong Objections to Proposals Bill Cane (Monday, 1 October)

RAND License acceptance Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy: W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web Carl Spangenberger (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Chris Woodard (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Nicu Pavel (Sunday, 30 September)

Thanks A Lot, Folks Tim (Sunday, 30 September)

NO NO NO Fred T. Krogh (Sunday, 30 September)

I say "NO!" to RAND Richard E. Brown (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy Byron Como (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy reed mideke (Sunday, 30 September)

One World, One Web, One Program......No W3C Greg T Hill (Sunday, 30 September)

Protest Iain Wilkie Logan (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed Patent Policy Mike Keehan (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed move to fee based standards David Stidolph (Sunday, 30 September)

Serious problems Rob Levin (Sunday, 30 September)

Patenting Standards David Clifton (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licencing ss@technicalpursuit.com (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Framework John Jensen (Sunday, 30 September)

non-royalty-free licensing Chris Moller (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Greer Pedoe (Sunday, 30 September)

LT: NO to RAND Proposal T.D. (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents and the W3C - NO ! Roy Carlson (Sunday, 30 September)

No patents as standards ... Albert A. Freeman (Sunday, 30 September)

Keep patented technologies out of W3C standards Michael Patrick (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND license is effectively impossible Stephen Drye (Sunday, 30 September)

Corporate Power Grabs Glenn Reynolds (Sunday, 30 September)

I implore you not to leave Opensource behind! Nathaniel Grady (Sunday, 30 September)

Crass Stupidity Chris Milton (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND -- "Whoops, you owe us royalties!" evan orensky (Sunday, 30 September)

What are you guys smoking? Rodrigo P. Gomez (Sunday, 30 September)

W3-patentpolicy Dennis Myers (Sunday, 30 September)

Nobility in Web Standards Joe Baker (Sunday, 30 September)

Effect on Mozilla etc Robert O'Callahan (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Shawn Lindsay (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND W3C David Fries (Sunday, 30 September)

patents in your standards HILL, WILLIAM (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patents -----> Monopoly Control Robert Gadsdon (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy prhodes@vdsinc.com (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on RAND policy proposal Patrick Wiseman (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND? please just don't. Terje Kvernes (Sunday, 30 September)

"RAND" Kevin B. McCarty (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy Joyce Conklin (Sunday, 30 September)

How could W3C even THINK of such a thing? Lloyd Llewellyn (Sunday, 30 September)

apologies for posting twice by accident Dave Burstein (Sunday, 30 September)

Unquantifiable Liability ? An Objection to the Patent Proposal Stuart Ellis (Sunday, 30 September)

NO Refuse (Sunday, 30 September)

"Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory" Keith Winstein (Sunday, 30 September)

Opposed to RAND patents in W3C standards Glenn Randers-Pehrson (Sunday, 30 September)

Corporate product lines as "standards" Jesse Klug (Sunday, 30 September)

I don't like the RAND license Konrad Maquestieau (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Comment pawel@jerzy.prz.rzeszow.pl (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND and the W3C Patent Policy Thomas Worthington (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND policy Frank A. Love (Sunday, 30 September)

Policy vs. mechanism Tim Bray (Sunday, 30 September)

Please say NO to royalty-bound patents for the web! co1ethompson@netscape.net (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C betrayal of principles Rodent of Unusual Size (Sunday, 30 September)

No to Patents, Yes to Discrimination Sheryl Coe (Sunday, 30 September)

Implementing RAND would be the death of W3C H. Peter Anvin (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licencing Meredydd (Sunday, 30 September)

FYI posting inspired by IP note Dave Burstein (Sunday, 30 September)

patentpolicy comment Martin Schlemmer (Sunday, 30 September)

Document contradicts own goals Dave Burstein (Sunday, 30 September)

Open Standards x Patents Alexandre Oliva (Sunday, 30 September)

Rand policies Nicolas Mailhot (Sunday, 30 September)

the promotion of fee base standards. florence (Sunday, 30 September)

This isn't necessary. I mean the W3C, that is. This patent hoopla raises legitimate issues about the viability of the W3C Joshua Prowse (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Policy Kieran Hand (Sunday, 30 September)

I'm horrified. Shawn Quinn (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Grant Robinson (Sunday, 30 September)

Very bad news Erik Sigra (Sunday, 30 September)

The patent-policy change (RAND) Stig E Sandoe (Sunday, 30 September)

What a joke you've become W3C. Darron Froese (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on proposed "RAND" policy Stanley A. Klein (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Jeremy Beaumont (Sunday, 30 September)

Consideration of Patented Standards Cymen Vig (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Model -- bad. kiss the sun and walk on air (Sunday, 30 September)

Strongly Opposed to W3C RAND patents Adam Logghe (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Theo de Raadt (Sunday, 30 September)

This is not a good idea Joe Klemmer (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy : chilling effect of RAND Bill Haneman (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Justin H. (Sunday, 30 September)

Remember the browser wars? Now, apply RAND.. Asteris Masouras (Sunday, 30 September)

Patented technologies inclusion in W3C standards Lucas Bajrasz (Sunday, 30 September)

Turning out the light... Danny Goodman (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing Christer O. Andersson (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments re: http://www.w3.org/2001/08/16-PP-FAQ.html Scott Hansohn (Sunday, 30 September)

You said it better than I can Mathieu Gervais (Sunday, 30 September)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> pbs (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND: Wrong! Jeff Trefftzs (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents can become an obstacle to free development/free world Francisco Rodrigo Escobedo Robles (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND John Helms (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Ben Reser (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND is bad for the Web Keith Dawson (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy Chris F.A. Johnson (Sunday, 30 September)

Please don't undo the good the W3C has achieved. Andrew A. Meier (Sunday, 30 September)

Royalty bound patents in web standards Steve Ball (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND is problematic Kevin Corlette (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web John Mc (Sunday, 30 September)

and what about the penny-less student? Hereward Cooper (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C: why are you fighting against your old friends? Chessy (Sunday, 30 September)

Please do not allow RAND licenses Loren Guthrie (Sunday, 30 September)

Allowing Patents==bad Chris Carlin (Sunday, 30 September)

strongly opposed to W3C endorsing non-royalty-free standards Arthur A. Gleckler (Sunday, 30 September)

Royalty-Bound Patents in Web Standards Joe Votour (Sunday, 30 September)

I believe RAND is a bad idea Tobias Gloth (Sunday, 30 September)

No Web Patents! Mark Hinds (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy: Bad for W3C, bad for business, bad for users Tom Cooper (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment to W3C Patent Policy Draft ferdinando.gallo@tin.it (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND considered harmful Tony Stieber (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C ridiculous new policy on patents Krux (Sunday, 30 September)

My opinion on the RAND proposal Ehsan Baseri (Sunday, 30 September)

Allowing patents in software standards is a mistake Curtis Galloway (Sunday, 30 September)

dangerous development Michel Koppelaar (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C patent policy Jerry Clabaugh (Sunday, 30 September)

Death of the W3C Max Dunn (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND: Friend or foe ? (or is w3c just abolishing themself) Niels Svennekjær (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on patent policy Aaron Claessens (Sunday, 30 September)

comments on patented and proprietary "standards" Noah Hafner (Sunday, 30 September)

Royalties and the W3C Andrew M.A. Cater (Sunday, 30 September)

Concerns about future fees for already implemented standards. Tom Bryan (Sunday, 30 September)

EXCELLENT... Everything is falling into place! <HAHAHahahahaha....> flacco (Sunday, 30 September)

Please do NOT incorporate RAND licensed technology in your recommendations Glen Harman (Sunday, 30 September)

Opposed to proposed patent policy Stephen R. Savitzky (Sunday, 30 September)

oppose RAND cgalpin@lighthouse-software.com (Sunday, 30 September)

The Internet must remain free (gratis and libre) Eric Gerlach (Sunday, 30 September)

The Internet was developed for the Free exchange of Information - not big business s (Sunday, 30 September)

new royalty based standard Matt Greer (Sunday, 30 September)

Don't even think about it Eric W. Sink (Sunday, 30 September)

Re: the shift in the position of the W3C on patented standards. David D. Hagood (Sunday, 30 September)

What part of "Free" or "open" don't you understand? Charles Dillon (Saturday, 29 September)

RAND Policy Jonathan Hudson (Sunday, 30 September)

The policy change with respect to patents (RAND) Karl Trygve Kalleberg (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing scheme Kisters (Sunday, 30 September)

Non-discriminatory licensing Anthony Taylor (Sunday, 30 September)

No to RAND license Wendell Schubert (Sunday, 30 September)

Patented standards == damage Keith Willoughby (Sunday, 30 September)

W3 Patent policy Scott Prive (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy Pawel Krawczyk (Sunday, 30 September)

patentpolicy wchackett (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Jeff Rafter (Sunday, 30 September)

The proposal is very harmful mate@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu (Sunday, 30 September)

NO Patents James Dornan (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND proposal Martin Wheeler (Sunday, 30 September)

response to your proposal Franki (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C patent policy Peter Kelly (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment Michal Kochanowicz (Sunday, 30 September)

New patent policy Ken Arromdee (Sunday, 30 September)

The Internet: for citizens as well as commerce? julesa (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing Jim Flynn (Sunday, 30 September)

It is so sad to see the W3C go David Waite (Sunday, 30 September)

No to RAND! Harry Zink (Sunday, 30 September)

NO to RAND Brent E. Edwards (Sunday, 30 September)

Do not allow "RAND" patents to pollute W3C standards Jamie McCrindle (Sunday, 30 September)

against patent-fees in w3c standards Thomas Strauss (Sunday, 30 September)

Concerns with implementing patented technology in W3C standard John Anderson (Sunday, 30 September)

Just say "no" to patents. Eric E. Coe (Sunday, 30 September)

MS attempt to kill Open Source projects Chris Worley (Sunday, 30 September)

do NOT allow non royalty free patents into W3C standards Kalle Näslund (Sunday, 30 September)

pateneted IP standards Archfeld Serethai (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Gerhard Poul (Sunday, 30 September)

Please reconsider Karl Jackson (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on RAND and RF type licencing Jeff Waller (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing model Philip Kendall (Sunday, 30 September)

against reasonable licensing Billw3c@sorehands.com (Sunday, 30 September)

Reject RAND proposal Tom Epperly (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing is a terrible mistake Moore, Louis (Sunday, 30 September)

A comment on RAND... Carey Nation (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on inclusion of patented technologies in standards: JUST SAY NO! Shawn Stamps (Sunday, 30 September)

comment Bruce Endries (Sunday, 30 September)

non-free standards Krzysztof Stańkowski (Sunday, 30 September)

Disturbing Zak McGregor (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Patent Policy John Keiser (Sunday, 30 September)

No to RAND policy Mark Fasheh (Sunday, 30 September)

My vote is against Bartolomé Sintes Marco (Sunday, 30 September)

opposed to w3c patent-friendly policy Jim Wright (Sunday, 30 September)

opposed to non-free standards Donald Ball (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents Will Interfere With Existing Market-Driven Processes Eric D. Hendrickson (Sunday, 30 September)

Just say No to RAND! (and RF) David Brownell (Sunday, 30 September)

No patents, please! Matthijs Sypkens Smit (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed changes to patent policy M Carling (Sunday, 30 September)

Proprietary standards. Rob Landley (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND license and the future of the web Antonio Larrosa Jiménez (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND only promotes big companies agenda Laurent 'case' Mahieux (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy tres (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND is not acceptable Chris Fox (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND policy change David R. Dick (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Concerns Darrell Parlee (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy The Plumblys (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed W3C Change on Patent Policy David Green (Sunday, 30 September)

comment Wolfram Tempel (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy: bad for everybody except big biz warren (Sunday, 30 September)

simple analysis Thompson Hayner (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed RAND Policy Alex Jacques (Sunday, 30 September)

Bad bad bad idea David Thede (Sunday, 30 September)

Redundancy of any comment Petter Sundlöf (Sunday, 30 September)

Backdoor attempt to banish Open-Source from the Web? Chris Rankin (Sunday, 30 September)

comment John D Griffith (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Julian Regel (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Jerry Dennany (Sunday, 30 September)

Patented standard = oxymoron. A thousand times NO!!! Martijn Dekker (Sunday, 30 September)

FREEDOM! fumetor (Sunday, 30 September)

There is no need for this. John Nagle (Sunday, 30 September)

Re: [OT] W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web Conan Callen (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Would Destroy W3C Greg Smith (Sunday, 30 September)

No proprietary standards Alan Batie (Sunday, 30 September)

w3c accepting patented technology as standards Daniel McLaury (Sunday, 30 September)

Concerns regarding RAND licensing. Marcus Lauer (Sunday, 30 September)

I will have to look for other standard bodies Juergen Strobel (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND initiative User FWC (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed patent policy destroys W3C mission nsmith@holycross.edu (Sunday, 30 September)

Disgust in proposed changes to W3C policy Graham TerMarsch (Sunday, 30 September)

Keep pay-for-play patents from the W3C C. Wegrzyn (Sunday, 30 September)

Against patents Ben Escoto (Sunday, 30 September)

Bad Idea Jeff Moe (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments Miguel Marcos (Sunday, 30 September)

please don't do it carlos (Sunday, 30 September)

new RAND licensing model comments Nicolas Ouedraogo (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C propsed patent policy Rodney Orpheus (Sunday, 30 September)

Yikes! Gary Kuever (Sunday, 30 September)

I object to RAND Jeremy Sanders (Sunday, 30 September)

Keep the standards patent-free H. Wade Minter (Sunday, 30 September)

no David Taté (Sunday, 30 September)

IMHO: Patents have no place in W3C Wally Trenholm (Sunday, 30 September)

Please do not encumber our standards with patents Jamie McCrindle (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy: NO Inaky Perez Gonzalez (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents & W3C standards David Eppstein (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents on W3C Standards Joe Brockmeier (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Patents in Standards? NO! Barak Pearlmutter (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents in web standards Jon Forsberg (Sunday, 30 September)

Bad changes in policies Christophe Prud'homme (Sunday, 30 September)

The proposal about allowing patents on W3C standards would take away the value of these. Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Paul R. Ganci (Sunday, 30 September)

Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users D. Hugh Redelmeier (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy gricard@mac.com (Sunday, 30 September)

Please reconsider RAND patent policy... R. Douglas Barbieri (Sunday, 30 September)

Objection to RAND licencing scheme David Pye (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C: Thank you for RAND licensing policy! Chip Warden (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents in your standards James Briant (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy David Magda (Sunday, 30 September)

Re:%20Comment%20on%20Patent%20Policy&In-Reply-To=<20010930165427.IXMU14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>&References=<20010930165427.IXMU14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> Darren Schlamp (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Mike O'Regan (Sunday, 30 September)

RF and RAND licencing Dave Macmurchie (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Shawn Starr (Sunday, 30 September)

Please remember PNG, and do not allow RAND to become policy Joanne Hunter (Sunday, 30 September)

No to RAND David Wright (Sunday, 30 September)

I oppose RAND TQ White II (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Sara Yurman (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C - turning it's back on the reasons that the Internet has thrived? Toby Haynes (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy Artur Skura (Sunday, 30 September)

No to RAND!!!! Angelia Kane (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Framework w3ccomment@nickwillson.com (Sunday, 30 September)

Proposed W3C Patent Policy John Ripley (Sunday, 30 September)

The Patented Internet Ben Gamari (Sunday, 30 September)

I don't agree. Luke (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents only use if completely free and unrestricted Doug Blatherwick (Sunday, 30 September)

If it ain't broke... don't fix it. Clark C . Evans (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licenses Vincent Marcus (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent encumbered standards squelch innovation Ed Warnicke (Sunday, 30 September)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Christopher Hicks (Sunday, 30 September)

royalty free standards only, please Stanley Krute (Sunday, 30 September)

So much for an independant body Neil Watson (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents and standards are mutually exclusive Peter Holt Hoffman (Sunday, 30 September)

Advice to lengthen the time to respond to the RAND licencing issue Erick Staal (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND is Discriminatory. Ivan Fontaine (Sunday, 30 September)

No Patents Burt Betchart (Sunday, 30 September)

* "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software * "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software John McBride (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy comment Edward Avis (Sunday, 30 September)

Fee-Bound W3C Standards scottr (Sunday, 30 September)

AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL! Total Computer Solutions (Sunday, 30 September)

patents Thomas Zander (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Dan (Sunday, 30 September)

Keep the web open Lee Bottemiller (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Barry Dorrans (Sunday, 30 September)

The closing of open standards. Kent Rosenkoetter (Sunday, 30 September)

patented technologies in W3C standards Tom Swiss (Sunday, 30 September)

Open, shared technology, not patents Pete Birkinshaw (Monday, 1 October)

Wow Giorgio Galante (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Chavous P. Camp (Sunday, 30 September)

rand licensing bigzirk@mac.com (Sunday, 30 September)

The W3C is dead Jean Zundel (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy : What a pity ! Antoine Drochon (Sunday, 30 September)

Use of propietary standard. PLEASE, DONT DO! 421621@ingta.unizar.es (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND: Sounds like a disaster in the making... Daniel P. B. Smith (Sunday, 30 September)

This will make the W3C be spammers!!! Kelly `STrRedWolf` Price (Sunday, 30 September)

Let's stick together! Stefan (Monday, 1 October)

Why I Discourage Patented Standards Sean (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy: Bad bad bad! Garth Highsmith (Sunday, 30 September)

Shameless attempt to commercialise the standards process Richard Moore (Sunday, 30 September)

opposed to RAND Eric Hawk (Sunday, 30 September)

Please, No Paul Chamberlain (Sunday, 30 September)

Please do not loosen W3C patent restrictions. Ken Wronkiewicz (Sunday, 30 September)

Open Source Exclusion by Any Royalty Based Patents David Wentzlaff (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Sean Borman (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents in W3C standards? Egad. Reuven M. Lerner (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments on RAND Bernhard Rosenkraenzer (Sunday, 30 September)

The new W3C patent related policy seems a bad thing Richard A Phillips (Sunday, 30 September)

patents are evil Francois-Rene Rideau (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND will kill the Web Tom Bruns (Sunday, 30 September)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Shad Van Den Hul (Sunday, 30 September)

Don't include patented technology in W3C standards! Nathan Culwell-Kanarek (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C appointing Microsoft, Apple, HP & Phillips to dig it's grave Tomas Pospisek (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Gavriel State (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments on proposed W3 patent policy rjh@world.std.com (Sunday, 30 September)

Open and Free Sylvester Chwastyk (Sunday, 30 September)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Patrick Lioi (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on the proposed patent policy change Durval Menezes (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Dr. Andrew Eric Mossberg (Sunday, 30 September)

New patent policy George (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on Patent Policy Darren.Schlamp@w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy and Free Internet (Rev.1) Robert M. Sexton (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND patent policy Rob Ewaschuk (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy and Free Internet Robert M. Sexton (Sunday, 30 September)

patent policy ray hartman (Sunday, 30 September)

Accepting for-fee-patents is a VERY bad idea Tuomas Lukka (Sunday, 30 September)

Against patented standards Nathan Poznick (Sunday, 30 September)

Royalty-bound patents in web standards Bruce Ediger (Sunday, 30 September)

What a shame. Bad shift. Ill fight against it Lea Gris (Sunday, 30 September)

No Patents in Standards Please! Luminescent (Sunday, 30 September)

Please say no to patented tech Scott Patten (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents should not have a place in the standards process! John Robb (Sunday, 30 September)

Think ahead Mike Lee (Sunday, 30 September)

"open standards", RAND, RF David Monniaux (Sunday, 30 September)

No Software Patents Rick McDonald (Sunday, 30 September)

against RAND proposal Galen Seitz (Sunday, 30 September)

Don't change policy. Jan D. (Sunday, 30 September)

New patent policy Ravi Nanavati (Sunday, 30 September)

No RAND Mika Huurre (Sunday, 30 September)

This is Appalling Eberhard Milde (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Chuck Mead (Sunday, 30 September)

Just say no! Richard Uhtenwoldt (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Jerry Davis (Sunday, 30 September)

Please keep the web OPEN Erik Moeller (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents aren't standar JUAN JOSE RAMIREZ ESCRIBANO (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Concerns Aaron Sherman (Sunday, 30 September)

Just say no! Justin Chapweske (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments on RAND licensing. Dr. Robert G. Rittenhouse (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Roy Barling (Sunday, 30 September)

Against new rules Maurice Rickard (Sunday, 30 September)

Objections to RAND provision of the Patent Policy Framework Mark DuPrey (Saturday, 29 September)

RAND licensing against opennes of the world wide web Luca Olivetti (Sunday, 30 September)

No longer "world-wide"? John Tobey (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licenseing comment Eric Kidd (Sunday, 30 September)

Patented Standards Jay Garcia (Sunday, 30 September)

Against proposals for RAND Licensing Ed Young (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND objection Vincent Joseph (Sunday, 30 September)

Universal freedom of expression Carsten Svaneborg (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments Regarding RAND Wroking draft VanL (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Tony O'Bryan (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Alan Cox (Sunday, 30 September)

Dear Sirs/Madams Allan Martinsen (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents in W3C recommendations Jacob Sparre Andersen (Sunday, 30 September)

Patented software fdsa (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Change Ross Werner (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND not appropriate for the Web. Fabian Guisset (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on proposed patent policy change Peter Toft (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Eric Fletcher (Sunday, 30 September)

Don't destroy the open web! J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Jean-Pierre Demailly (Sunday, 30 September)

paid royalties for standards which use patents Leon Harris (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Volker Hett (Sunday, 30 September)

Open Source will RANDel your heads! Lungo detto il Maltese (Sunday, 30 September)

Stop Software Patents! Erik Lange (Sunday, 30 September)

Patents in W3C technical documents Jeff Bailey (Sunday, 30 September)

comments on rand Yong Chi (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND policy Tom McDonald (Sunday, 30 September)

Patented standards = stifling innovation Ole Tange (Sunday, 30 September)

royalty-free standards needed Jeffrey Nelson (Sunday, 30 September)

No RAND, please! Christian Lavoie (Sunday, 30 September)

Please reconsider this course of action Pete Stewart (Sunday, 30 September)

Please do not allow patented standards Simo Sorce (Sunday, 30 September)

It's so simple: We need a new W3C Lungo detto il Maltese (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND policy unprivileged user (Sunday, 30 September)

Please! No royalty-based standards! Jesper Juul (Sunday, 30 September)

Concerns about RAND licensing terms Yaron M. Minsky (Sunday, 30 September)

I hope you know wath you are doing. Jonny Torvald Strom (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on RAND policy David F. Skoll (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND = W3C suicide Xavi Drudis Ferran (Sunday, 30 September)

What are you *thinking*?!?! Eli Wallach (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Working Draft 16 August 2001 Gary Houston (Sunday, 30 September)

Web standards should be patent free Alan Johnson (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND Licensing Levi (Sunday, 30 September)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> oscar (Sunday, 30 September)

standarts should be royalty and thus patent free Jon Bendtsen (Sunday, 30 September)

The RAND conflicts with the philosophy of the internet Jonas Kongslund (Sunday, 30 September)

Web standards should be patent-free Tomasz Kwiatkowski (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND and OSS Gunter Ohrner (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND license terms are rediculous! Erik Nørgaard (Sunday, 30 September)

The RAND Jørgen Ramskov (Sunday, 30 September)

RAD working draft Joerg F.Wittenberger (Sunday, 30 September)

Objections to the Working Draft Alastair Burt (Sunday, 30 September)

No to fee-based standards Dmitri Kulikov (Sunday, 30 September)

patent ? no royalty-free license ? Galle Michel (Sunday, 30 September)

Is it time for GNU standarts organization? Alexey Medvedev (Sunday, 30 September)

patents Karl Heyes (Sunday, 30 September)

Nooooooooooooooo! Jonas Jørgensen (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing and open source software Peter Wainwright (Sunday, 30 September)

Final Comment Adam Warner (Sunday, 30 September)

against new rules cm (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on proposed patent policy Andrew Bennetts (Sunday, 30 September)

Fighting for the right for free information exchange Erik Norgaard <Erik Norgaard (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND license Anthony Hawes (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND License Garbage devnull@csp.net (Sunday, 30 September)

w3c creating its own competition Albert Weichselbraun (Sunday, 30 September)

royalty free standards chrissy (Sunday, 30 September)

A good hit to the open & free nature of web development Vicente A.S. Werner (Sunday, 30 September)

Public comment George.Turner@command.de (Sunday, 30 September)

comment rm (Sunday, 30 September)

A complete reversal of policy Daniel von Asmuth (Sunday, 30 September)

Sickening Carl Ebrey (Sunday, 30 September)

concerns about new RAND licensing Andreas Mohr (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing and WWW standards - another vote against this atrocity Yanko Kaneti (Sunday, 30 September)

LT: \"But we posted it\" Charles (Sunday, 30 September)

Comments on proposed patent policy Maciej Stachowiak (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND: hat about everyone else? Sean Middleditch (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C RAND proposed recommendation... Jeremy James (Sunday, 30 September)

Against patent policy changes James Henstridge (Sunday, 30 September)

Do not allow patents into w3c standards Robin * Slomkowski (Sunday, 30 September)

true standards do not allow patented material Kenny Graunke (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND comment Glenn Alexander (Sunday, 30 September)

A question Alexander Hristov (Sunday, 30 September)

Unbelievably bad. Christopher Cashell (Sunday, 30 September)

Resistance is not futile. GreyFauk (Sunday, 30 September)

Please extend the comment period Seth Nickell (Sunday, 30 September)

FUCKING UNBELIEVABLE Web User (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing mark@otford.kent.btinternet.co.uk (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND licensing policy Deke Clinger (Sunday, 30 September)

licensing John Proctor (Sunday, 30 September)

w3c nonsense steve (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy - RAND may be misguided Matthew Easton (Sunday, 30 September)

[Fwd: [fairuse] My letter to the W3C: Please do not allow any W3C standard to beencumbered by patents.] Seth Johnson (Sunday, 30 September)

Appalling Hamish MacEwan (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND => effectively proprietary standard Jonathan Graehl (Sunday, 30 September)

Please do not allow any W3C standard to be encumbered by patents. Jay Sulzberger (Sunday, 30 September)

W3C Patent Policy Cay Horstmann (Sunday, 30 September)

Do not adopt the RAND policy. It will kill the W3C Erick Staal (Sunday, 30 September)

Re: "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software Adam Warner (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent policy Chris McDonough (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND & intellectual property Toby & Toni Meehan (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND et al davem@fdgroup.co.uk (Sunday, 30 September)

"Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software Seth Nickell (Sunday, 30 September)

Re: RAND proposal for WWW. Jeremy Allison (Sunday, 30 September)

Why Tim Berners-Lee is against the RAND jk05308 (Sunday, 30 September)

Patent Policy Comment mesmith@panix.com (Sunday, 30 September)

Sell out covered up by NewSpeak jk05308 (Sunday, 30 September)

Comment on Patent Policy Sidney Felder (Sunday, 30 September)

I am appalled Dennis W. Tokarski (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND & W3C Boyd Fletcher (Sunday, 30 September)

my name and other matters Gold is Heavy (Sunday, 30 September)

Fee-based Standards Jeremy M. Dolan (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND and patents have no place on the WEB!!! Christy Ware (Sunday, 30 September)

RAND LICENSING IS BAD -- will do all I can to stop it Gold is Heavy (Sunday, 30 September)

"RAND" licensing concerns... Frank Earl (Sunday, 30 September)

No RAND standards Paul (Sunday, 30 September)

Serious issues of concern about internet patents Eric Laffoon (Sunday, 30 September)

Against W3C Patent Policy (RAND) Samuel Hart (Sunday, 30 September)

Money will do more to destroy the web the goverments. Shaun Savage (Saturday, 29 September)

If you start patenting the web, Michael H. Voase (Sunday, 30 September)

against w3 patents Mike Coleman (Saturday, 29 September)

WWW_Under_Attack anatoly (Saturday, 29 September)

Dissent and comment Mario D. Santana (Saturday, 29 September)

Comment on proposed patent policy change jbash@velvet.com (Saturday, 29 September)

Your Utter Arrogance is Showing tom poe (Saturday, 29 September)

My opinion on new policy ilya@ns2.total-knowledge.com (Saturday, 29 September)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Proposal John Hasler (Friday, 28 September)

W3C Patent Policy Framework Comment Adam Warner (Friday, 28 September)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Gerald Lane (Thursday, 27 September)

Comments for WD-patent-policy-20010816 Susan Lesch (Monday, 24 September)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:57:46 UTC