www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from September 2001 by author

421621@ingta.unizar.es

• Use of propietary standard. PLEASE, DONT DO! (Sunday, 30 September)

A Seaman

• Reject this proposal (Monday, 1 October)

A. Chavan

• Opposed To Patents In Web Standards (Monday, 1 October)
• Opposed To Patents In Web Standards (Monday, 1 October)

Aaron Claessens

• Comment on patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Aaron R. Kulkis

• Microsoft patenting the WWW ??? (Sunday, 30 September)

Aaron Sherman

• RAND Licensing Concerns (Sunday, 30 September)

Aaron Swartz

• Patent policy draft severely flawed (Sunday, 30 September)

Adam Logghe

• Strongly Opposed to W3C RAND patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Adam Megacz

• Brief words regarding RAND, capital, and non-capital economies (Sunday, 30 September)

Adam Warner

• W3C Responds (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Please extend the comment deadline (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: standarts should be royalty and thus patent free (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: Web standards should be patent-free (Sunday, 30 September)
• Final Comment (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software (Sunday, 30 September)
• W3C Patent Policy Framework Comment (Friday, 28 September)

Adrian Harte

• W3C Patent Policy Framework (Monday, 1 October)

Alan Batie

• No proprietary standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Alan Cox

• W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Alan Johnson

• Web standards should be patent free (Sunday, 30 September)

Alastair Burt

• Objections to the Working Draft (Sunday, 30 September)

Albert A. Freeman

• No patents as standards ... (Sunday, 30 September)

Albert Weichselbraun

• w3c creating its own competition (Sunday, 30 September)

Alex Jacques

• Proposed RAND Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Alexander Hristov

• A question (Sunday, 30 September)
• RAND standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Alexandre Oliva

• Open Standards x Patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Alexey Medvedev

• Is it time for GNU standarts organization? (Sunday, 30 September)

Allan Martinsen

• Dear Sirs/Madams (Sunday, 30 September)

anatoly

• WWW_Under_Attack (Saturday, 29 September)

Anders S. Buch

• Please keep patents out of standards! (Monday, 1 October)

Andreas Mohr

• concerns about new RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Andreas Pour

• RAND Will Discredit W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Andrew A. Meier

• Please don't undo the good the W3C has achieved. (Sunday, 30 September)

Andrew Bennetts

• Comment on proposed patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Andrew M.A. Cater

• Royalties and the W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Andrew Pam

• Comment on draft W3C Patent Policy Framework (Monday, 1 October)

Andrew Williams

• Who pays? (Monday, 1 October)

Andy Scholz

• Comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Angelia Kane

• No to RAND!!!! (Sunday, 30 September)

Anselm Hook

• Objection to patent policy (Monday, 1 October)

Antaeus Feldspar

• RAND licensing is a bad idea (Sunday, 30 September)

Anthony Hawes

• RAND license (Sunday, 30 September)

Anthony Taylor

• Non-discriminatory licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Antoine Drochon

• W3C Patent Policy : What a pity ! (Sunday, 30 September)

Antonio Larrosa Jiménez

• RAND license and the future of the web (Sunday, 30 September)

Archfeld Serethai

• pateneted IP standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Arthur A. Gleckler

• strongly opposed to W3C endorsing non-royalty-free standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Artur Skura

• Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Aschwin van der Woude

• Re: Comment on proposed patent policy change (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Sunday, 30 September)

Asteris Masouras

• Remember the browser wars? Now, apply RAND.. (Sunday, 30 September)

b

• I do not agree with RAND (Monday, 1 October)

baptiste13@altern.org

• RAND licences: don\'t act unresponsibly and cowardly (Sunday, 30 September)

Barak Pearlmutter

• RAND Patents in Standards? NO! (Sunday, 30 September)

Barry Dorrans

• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Bartolomé Sintes Marco

• My vote is against (Sunday, 30 September)

beasley

• patent policy (Monday, 1 October)

Becky Kearns

• RAND license *is* discriminatory... (Monday, 1 October)

Ben Crowell

• Patent owners should fend for themselves. (Monday, 1 October)

Ben Escoto

• Against patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Ben Ford

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Ben Gamari

• The Patented Internet (Sunday, 30 September)

Ben Reser

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Bernhard Rosenkraenzer

• Comments on RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Bernie@Hoefer.trw.com

• Do Not Adopt The Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

bigzirk@mac.com

• rand licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Bill Cane

• Strong Objections to Proposals (Monday, 1 October)

Bill Evans

• Reflection (Monday, 1 October)

Bill Gunn

• Anti-User RAND Licensing Policy (Monday, 1 October)

Bill Haneman

• patent policy : chilling effect of RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Billw3c@sorehands.com

• against reasonable licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Bob Cunnings

• Impact on existing WG's (Monday, 1 October)

Boddhisatva Troutwaxer

• RAND Bad (Monday, 1 October)

Boyd Fletcher

• RAND & W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Branden Robinson

• failure to communicate (Monday, 1 October)
• I concur with Alan Cox (Monday, 1 October)

Branen Salmon

• Patents would stunt evolution of the web (Sunday, 30 September)

Brent E. Edwards

• NO to RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Brian Ashe

• Allowance of RAND in standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Brian Marick

• Re: Advice to lengthen the time to respond to the RAND licencing issue (Sunday, 30 September)

Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO

• Commment on patent changes (Monday, 1 October)

Bruce Ediger

• Royalty-bound patents in web standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Bruce Endries

• comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Bruce Krysiak

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Bryan McCormick

• Comment on RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Burt Betchart

• No Patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Byron Como

• Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

C. Wegrzyn

• Keep pay-for-play patents from the W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Calvin

• patent free web (Sunday, 30 September)

Cameron Kellough

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Carey Nation

• A comment on RAND... (Sunday, 30 September)

Carl Ebrey

• Sickening (Sunday, 30 September)

Carl Spangenberger

• W3C Patent Policy: W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web (Sunday, 30 September)

carlos

• please don't do it (Sunday, 30 September)

Carsten Svaneborg

• Universal freedom of expression (Sunday, 30 September)

Carsten Ziepke

• World Wide Web is International (Sunday, 30 September)

Cay Horstmann

• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

cgalpin@lighthouse-software.com

• oppose RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Charles

• LT: \"But we posted it\" (Sunday, 30 September)

Charles Dillon

• What part of "Free" or "open" don't you understand? (Saturday, 29 September)

Charles Sullivan

• Proposed RAND licensing model - AGAINST (Monday, 1 October)

Chase Tingley

• RAND licensing inappropriate for web technologies (Sunday, 30 September)

Chavous P. Camp

• RE: W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)
• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Chessy

• W3C: why are you fighting against your old friends? (Sunday, 30 September)

Chip Warden

• W3C: Thank you for RAND licensing policy! (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris

• Patents are dangerous to open standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris Carlin

• Allowing Patents==bad (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris F.A. Johnson

• Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris Fox

• RAND is not acceptable (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris Herron

• Negative Comments (Monday, 1 October)

Chris Leyon

• Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

Chris McDonough

• Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris Milton

• Crass Stupidity (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris Moller

• non-royalty-free licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris Rankin

• Backdoor attempt to banish Open-Source from the Web? (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris Woodard

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Chris Worley

• MS attempt to kill Open Source projects (Sunday, 30 September)

chrissy

• royalty free standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Christer O. Andersson

• RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Christian Langreiter

• W3C and patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Christian Lavoie

• No RAND, please! (Sunday, 30 September)

Christian Mogensen

• Vote NO on RAND Patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Christophe Prud'homme

• Bad changes in policies (Sunday, 30 September)

Christopher Baker

• Royalty-Bound Patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Christopher Cashell

• Unbelievably bad. (Sunday, 30 September)

Christopher Felton

• Stop This (Monday, 1 October)

Christopher Hicks

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Sunday, 30 September)

Christopher Ramey

• No. This opens the door to corruption. (Saturday, 29 September)

Christy Ware

• RAND and patents have no place on the WEB!!! (Sunday, 30 September)

Chuck Mead

• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Clark C . Evans

• If it ain't broke... don't fix it. (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

cm

• against new rules (Sunday, 30 September)

co1ethompson@netscape.net

• Please say NO to royalty-bound patents for the web! (Sunday, 30 September)

Conan Callen

• Re: [OT] W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web (Sunday, 30 September)

Curtis Galloway

• Allowing patents in software standards is a mistake (Sunday, 30 September)

Cymen Vig

• Consideration of Patented Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

D Tuinstra

• Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

D. Hugh Redelmeier

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Dale Pontius

• Patent encumbrance of standards unwise in international relations (Monday, 1 October)

Damien Miller

• Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

dan

• Fee-bound patents (Sunday, 30 September)
• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Dan York

• I am concerned about allowing RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Daniel Boos

• Patent and Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Daniel L Speyer

• RAND clause and W3C's mission (Sunday, 30 September)

Daniel McLaury

• w3c accepting patented technology as standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Daniel P. B. Smith

• RAND: Sounds like a disaster in the making... (Sunday, 30 September)

Daniel Veillard

• Deeply concerned about the possible change of accepted IPR policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Daniel von Asmuth

• A complete reversal of policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Danny Goodman

• Turning out the light... (Sunday, 30 September)

Darrell Parlee

• RAND Concerns (Sunday, 30 September)

Darren Schlamp

• Re:%20Comment%20on%20Patent%20Policy&In-Reply-To=<20010930165427.IXMU14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>&References=<20010930165427.IXMU14306.femail26.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> (Sunday, 30 September)

Darren.Schlamp@w3.org

• Comment on Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Darron Froese

• What a joke you've become W3C. (Sunday, 30 September)

Dave Bauer

• RAND is a bad idea (Sunday, 30 September)

Dave Burstein

• apologies for posting twice by accident (Sunday, 30 September)
• FYI posting inspired by IP note (Sunday, 30 September)
• Document contradicts own goals (Sunday, 30 September)

Dave Clendenan

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Dave Lacy Kusters

• Patented recommendations (Sunday, 30 September)

Dave Macmurchie

• RF and RAND licencing (Sunday, 30 September)

davem@fdgroup.co.uk

• RAND et al (Sunday, 30 September)

david

• NO to new RAND proposal! (Sunday, 30 September)

David Brownell

• Just say No to RAND! (and RF) (Sunday, 30 September)

David Casti

• incorporating patented technology in W3 standards (Monday, 1 October)

David Clifton

• Patenting Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

David D. Hagood

• Re: the shift in the position of the W3C on patented standards. (Sunday, 30 September)

David Eppstein

• Patents & W3C standards (Sunday, 30 September)

David F. Skoll

• Comment on RAND policy (Sunday, 30 September)

David Fries

• RAND W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

David Gould

• Against a patent encumbered internet. (Sunday, 30 September)

David Green

• Proposed W3C Change on Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

David H. Silber

• Patent Policy Comment (Sunday, 30 September)

David Leppik

• Re: W3C Patent Policy Framework (Sunday, 30 September)

David Magda

• patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

David McCusker

• against accomodating patents (Sunday, 30 September)

David Monniaux

• "open standards", RAND, RF (Sunday, 30 September)

David Northover

• Proposed RAND Licensing Terms (Monday, 1 October)

David O'Brien

• RAND (www patent policy) standards (Sunday, 30 September)

David Pye

• Objection to RAND licencing scheme (Sunday, 30 September)

David R. Dick

• RAND policy change (Sunday, 30 September)

David Stidolph

• Proposed move to fee based standards (Sunday, 30 September)

David Taté

• no (Sunday, 30 September)

David Thede

• Bad bad bad idea (Sunday, 30 September)

David Waite

• It is so sad to see the W3C go (Sunday, 30 September)

David Wentzlaff

• Open Source Exclusion by Any Royalty Based Patents (Sunday, 30 September)

David Wheeler

• Permit _ONLY_ royalty-free working groups in the W3C! (Monday, 1 October)

David Wragg

• comments on the working draft (Sunday, 30 September)

David Wright

• No to RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Deke Clinger

• RAND licensing policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Dennis Myers

• W3-patentpolicy (Sunday, 30 September)

Dennis Sosnoski

• No to RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Dennis W. Tokarski

• I am appalled (Sunday, 30 September)

devnull@csp.net

• RAND License Garbage (Sunday, 30 September)

Dmitri Kulikov

• No to fee-based standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Don

• RAND comment (Monday, 1 October)

Donald Ball

• opposed to non-free standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Doug Blatherwick

• Patents only use if completely free and unrestricted (Sunday, 30 September)

Doug Dew

• Please don't do this (Sunday, 30 September)

Douglas Brebner

• Submarine patents (Monday, 1 October)

Douglas Goodwin

• Opposition To Rand (Sunday, 30 September)

Dr. Andrew Eric Mossberg

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Dr. Robert G. Rittenhouse

• Comments on RAND licensing. (Sunday, 30 September)

Durval Menezes

• Comment on the proposed patent policy change (Sunday, 30 September)

E L Tonkin

• RAND (Monday, 1 October)

Eben Moglen

• W3C patent policy (Monday, 1 October)

Eberhard Milde

• This is Appalling (Sunday, 30 September)

Ed Warnicke

• Patent encumbered standards squelch innovation (Sunday, 30 September)

Ed Young

• Against proposals for RAND Licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Edward Avis

• Patent policy comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Ehsan Baseri

• My opinion on the RAND proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

Eli Wallach

• What are you *thinking*?!?! (Sunday, 30 September)

Elliot Glaysher

• No good can come of this. Please reject this proposal! (Sunday, 30 September)

Enrique Baraibar

• Please, reject RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Eric D. Hendrickson

• Patents Will Interfere With Existing Market-Driven Processes (Sunday, 30 September)

Eric E. Coe

• Just say "no" to patents. (Sunday, 30 September)

Eric Fletcher

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Eric Gerlach

• The Internet must remain free (gratis and libre) (Sunday, 30 September)

Eric Hawk

• opposed to RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Eric Kidd

• RAND licenseing comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Eric Laffoon

• Serious issues of concern about internet patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Eric W. Sink

• Don't even think about it (Sunday, 30 September)

Erick Staal

• Advice to lengthen the time to respond to the RAND licencing issue (Sunday, 30 September)
• Do not adopt the RAND policy. It will kill the W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Erik Lange

• Stop Software Patents! (Sunday, 30 September)

Erik Moeller

• Please keep the web OPEN (Sunday, 30 September)

Erik Norgaard <Erik Norgaard

• Fighting for the right for free information exchange (Sunday, 30 September)

Erik Nørgaard

• RAND license terms are rediculous! (Sunday, 30 September)

Erik Sigra

• Very bad news (Sunday, 30 September)

Erik Trimble

• Allowing patents in Standards is the antithesis of the W3C charter (Monday, 1 October)

evan orensky

• RAND -- "Whoops, you owe us royalties!" (Sunday, 30 September)

Evelio Perez-Albuerne

• Incorporating patented technology in W3C standards is a bad idea (Sunday, 30 September)

Fabian Guisset

• RAND not appropriate for the Web. (Sunday, 30 September)

Farboj

• NO TO PATENT STANDARDS. (Sunday, 30 September)

fdsa

• Patented software (Sunday, 30 September)

ferdinando.gallo@tin.it

• Comment to W3C Patent Policy Draft (Sunday, 30 September)

flacco

• EXCELLENT... Everything is falling into place! <HAHAHahahahaha....> (Sunday, 30 September)

florence

• the promotion of fee base standards. (Sunday, 30 September)

Florian Weimer

• Comments On The W3C Patent Policy Framework Draft (Sunday, 30 September)

Forrest Sweasy

• RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Francisco Rodrigo Escobedo Robles

• Patents can become an obstacle to free development/free world (Sunday, 30 September)

Franck Coppola

• Comments on the draft. (Sunday, 30 September)

Francois-Rene Rideau

• patents are evil (Sunday, 30 September)

Frank A. Love

• RAND policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Frank Earl

• "RAND" licensing concerns... (Sunday, 30 September)

Franki

• response to your proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

Fred T. Krogh

• NO NO NO (Sunday, 30 September)

Frederick R. Hanhisalo

• RAND (Monday, 1 October)

Frode Sørmo

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

fumetor

• FREEDOM! (Sunday, 30 September)

G. Edward Johnson

• RAND will hurt the W3C and the Internet. (Monday, 1 October)

Galen Seitz

• against RAND proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

Galle Michel

• patent ? no royalty-free license ? (Sunday, 30 September)

Gardner Neely

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Monday, 1 October)
• I oppose RAND (Monday, 1 October)

Gareth McCaughan

• On the proposed patent policy of the W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Garth Highsmith

• W3C Patent Policy: Bad bad bad! (Sunday, 30 September)

Gary C

• W3C Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

Gary Houston

• W3C Working Draft 16 August 2001 (Sunday, 30 September)

Gary Kuever

• Yikes! (Sunday, 30 September)

Gavriel State

• RAND Licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

geo

• new patent policy (Monday, 1 October)

Geoff Depew

• Commentary on Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

George

• New patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

George Toft

• Opposition to Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

George Vagenas

• Re RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

George.Turner@command.de

• Public comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Gerald Lane

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Thursday, 27 September)

Gerald T. Hewes

• W3C Patent Policy Framework (Sunday, 30 September)

Gerhard Poul

• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Gervase Markham

• RAND: Working Group comment requested (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Please extend the comment deadline (Sunday, 30 September)
• Even current standards are not safe! (Sunday, 30 September)

Giorgio Galante

• Wow (Sunday, 30 September)

Glen Harman

• Please do NOT incorporate RAND licensed technology in your recommendations (Sunday, 30 September)

Glenn Alexander

• RAND comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Glenn Crocker

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Glenn Randers-Pehrson

• Re: Comments On The W3C Patent Policy Framework Draft (Sunday, 30 September)
• Opposed to RAND patents in W3C standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Glenn Reynolds

• Corporate Power Grabs (Sunday, 30 September)

Gold is Heavy

• my name and other matters (Sunday, 30 September)
• RAND LICENSING IS BAD -- will do all I can to stop it (Sunday, 30 September)

Graham TerMarsch

• Disgust in proposed changes to W3C policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Grant Robinson

• RAND Licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Graydon Hoare

• comments on your patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Greer Pedoe

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Greg Johnson

• I oppose the W3C's proposed change in patent policy. (Monday, 1 October)

Greg Smith

• RAND Would Destroy W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Greg T Hill

• One World, One Web, One Program......No W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

GreyFauk

• Resistance is not futile. (Sunday, 30 September)

gricard@mac.com

• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Guillermo S. Romero

• About standards and limitations (Sunday, 30 September)

Gunter Ohrner

• RAND and OSS (Sunday, 30 September)

H. Peter Anvin

• Implementing RAND would be the death of W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

H. Wade Minter

• Keep the standards patent-free (Sunday, 30 September)

Hamish MacEwan

• Appalling (Sunday, 30 September)

Hans Ridder

• NO to proposed RAND patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Harold Riggs

• Re: RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Harry Zink

• No to RAND! (Sunday, 30 September)

Hereward Cooper

• and what about the penny-less student? (Sunday, 30 September)

HILL, WILLIAM

• patents in your standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Hilmar Berger

• patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Homer Matthew Smith

• Please don't do it. (Sunday, 30 September)

hugh d fegely

• RAND proprosal (Monday, 1 October)

Iain Wilkie Logan

• Protest (Sunday, 30 September)

Ilya Volynets

• RE: Dissent and comment (Saturday, 29 September)
• Re: My opinion on new policy (Saturday, 29 September)

ilya@ns2.total-knowledge.com

• My opinion on new policy (Saturday, 29 September)

Inaky Perez Gonzalez

• W3C Patent Policy: NO (Sunday, 30 September)

Irise Lenoir

• I hope you realise (Monday, 1 October)

Ivan Fontaine

• RAND is Discriminatory. (Sunday, 30 September)

J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)

• Don't destroy the open web! (Sunday, 30 September)

Jacob Sparre Andersen

• Patents in W3C recommendations (Sunday, 30 September)

James Arthurs

• Re: RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

James Briant

• Patents in your standards (Sunday, 30 September)

James Clark

• All Recommendations should be royalty-free (Monday, 1 October)

James Dornan

• NO Patents (Sunday, 30 September)

James Henstridge

• Against patent policy changes (Sunday, 30 September)

James Young

• The concept of RAND is in itself discriminatory (Monday, 1 October)

Jamie McCrindle

• Do not allow "RAND" patents to pollute W3C standards (Sunday, 30 September)
• Please do not encumber our standards with patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Jan C. Zawadzki

• Comment re. allowing patented technologies (Monday, 1 October)

Jan D.

• Don't change policy. (Sunday, 30 September)

Jay Garcia

• Patented Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Jay Sulzberger

• Please do not allow any W3C standard to be encumbered by patents. (Sunday, 30 September)

jbash@velvet.com

• Comment on proposed patent policy change (Saturday, 29 September)

Jean Pierre LeJacq

• Strongly disagree with proposal to allow non-royalty-free standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Jean Zundel

• The W3C is dead (Sunday, 30 September)

Jean-Pierre Demailly

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeff Bailey

• Patents in W3C technical documents (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeff Moe

• Bad Idea (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeff Rafter

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeff Trefftzs

• RAND: Wrong! (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeff Waller

• Comment on RAND and RF type licencing (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeffrey Nelson

• royalty-free standards needed (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeffrey W. Baker

• World Wide Web, RAND, and people without a lot of money (Monday, 1 October)

Jeremy Allison

• Re: RAND proposal for WWW. (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeremy Beaumont

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeremy James

• W3C RAND proposed recommendation... (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeremy M. Dolan

• Fee-based Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeremy Sanders

• I object to RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Jeremy Scrivener

• Opposed to new draft of policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Jerry Asher

• It doesn't make sense, it isn't fair, and it's regressive (Monday, 1 October)

Jerry Clabaugh

• W3C patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Jerry Davis

• RAND Licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Jerry Dennany

• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Jesper Juhl

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Saturday, 29 September)
• Please don't (Saturday, 29 September)

Jesper Juul

• Please! No royalty-based standards! (Sunday, 30 September)

Jesse Klug

• Corporate product lines as "standards" (Sunday, 30 September)

Jim Bauer

• RAND uglyness (Monday, 1 October)

Jim Flynn

• RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Jim Wright

• opposed to w3c patent-friendly policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Jim Zellmer

• Against W3 PATENT POLICY (Monday, 1 October)

jk05308

• Why Tim Berners-Lee is against the RAND (Sunday, 30 September)
• Sell out covered up by NewSpeak (Sunday, 30 September)

JKelly

• Some thoughts about standards (short) (Monday, 1 October)

Jo Dillon

• Patent policy (Monday, 1 October)

Joanne Hunter

• Please remember PNG, and do not allow RAND to become policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Joe Baker

• Nobility in Web Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Joe Brockmeier

• Patents on W3C Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Joe Klemmer

• This is not a good idea (Sunday, 30 September)

Joe Votour

• Royalty-Bound Patents in Web Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Joerg F.Wittenberger

• RAD working draft (Sunday, 30 September)

Johan Bager

• Adoption of recommendations (Monday, 1 October)

Johan Landström

• Even the idea is absurd... (Sunday, 30 September)

john

• Fee based web standard (Sunday, 30 September)

John (EBo) David

• comments on: W3C Considers Royalty-Bound Patents In Web Standards (Monday, 1 October)

John Anderson

• Concerns with implementing patented technology in W3C standard (Sunday, 30 September)

John Beimler

• This policy is wrong (Sunday, 30 September)

John D Griffith

• comment (Sunday, 30 September)

John F. Nixon

• The proposed policy is bad news (Monday, 1 October)

John F. Sowa

• Comments on proposed patent policy (Monday, 1 October)

John Gilmore

• RF > RAMMED * Deadline extension? * W3C should serve the PUBLIC interest (Monday, 1 October)

John Hasler

• W3C Patent Policy Framework Proposal (Friday, 28 September)

John Helms

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

John Jensen

• W3C Patent Policy Framework (Sunday, 30 September)

John Keiser

• RAND Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

John Mc

• W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web (Sunday, 30 September)

John McBride

• * "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software * "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software (Sunday, 30 September)

John Nagle

• There is no need for this. (Sunday, 30 September)

John Panzer

• Comment: Against. (Monday, 1 October)

John Proctor

• licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

John Ripley

• Proposed W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

John Robb

• Patents should not have a place in the standards process! (Sunday, 30 September)

John Robert Boynton

• Should drop RAND, or re-open public discussion (Sunday, 30 September)

John Tobey

• No longer "world-wide"? (Sunday, 30 September)

John William Dalton

• Keep patent policy as it is (please) (Monday, 1 October)

Jon Bendtsen

• standarts should be royalty and thus patent free (Sunday, 30 September)

Jon Forsberg

• Patents in web standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Jonas Jørgensen

• Nooooooooooooooo! (Sunday, 30 September)

Jonas Kongslund

• The RAND conflicts with the philosophy of the internet (Sunday, 30 September)

Jonas Sicking

• Please let webstandards be freely implementable by ALL (Monday, 1 October)

Jonathan Graehl

• RAND => effectively proprietary standard (Sunday, 30 September)

Jonathan Hudson

• RAND Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Jonathan Mark

• patent policy comment (Monday, 1 October)

Jonathon Sim

• RAND versus freedom (Monday, 1 October)

Jonny Torvald Strom

• I hope you know wath you are doing. (Sunday, 30 September)

Jose Fandos

• Objections to RAND. (Monday, 1 October)

Josef Schneider

• patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Josh Sandberg

• Say No to RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Josh Walgenbach

• change in standards policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Joshua Prowse

• This isn't necessary. I mean the W3C, that is. This patent hoopla raises legitimate issues about the viability of the W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Joyce Conklin

• Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

JP Glutting

• Proposed Patent Pollicy Framework (Monday, 1 October)

JP Schnapper-Casteras

• RAND, Accessibility, and the Digital Divide (Monday, 1 October)

JUAN JOSE RAMIREZ ESCRIBANO

• Patents aren't standar (Sunday, 30 September)

Judyth Mermelstein

• Comment on RAND patent implementation (Monday, 1 October)

Juergen Strobel

• I will have to look for other standard bodies (Sunday, 30 September)

julesa

• The Internet: for citizens as well as commerce? (Sunday, 30 September)

Julian Coombes

• Royalty-Bound Patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Julian Morrison

• Please avoid patented standards, even "RAND" (Sunday, 30 September)

Julian Regel

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Justin Chapweske

• Just say no! (Sunday, 30 September)

Justin H.

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Jørgen Ramskov

• The RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Kalle Näslund

• do NOT allow non royalty free patents into W3C standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Karl Heyes

• patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Karl Jackson

• Please reconsider (Sunday, 30 September)

Karl Trygve Kalleberg

• The policy change with respect to patents (RAND) (Sunday, 30 September)

Karsten M. Self

• W3C "RAND" Patent Policy Framework draft (Sunday, 30 September)

Keith Dawson

• RAND is bad for the Web (Sunday, 30 September)

Keith Willoughby

• Patented standards == damage (Sunday, 30 September)

Keith Winstein

• "Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory" (Sunday, 30 September)

Kelly `STrRedWolf` Price

• This will make the W3C be spammers!!! (Sunday, 30 September)

Kelvin Param

• W3C is a pawn in an IT Cartel (Monday, 1 October)

Ken Arromdee

• New patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Ken Wronkiewicz

• Please do not loosen W3C patent restrictions. (Sunday, 30 September)

Ken Yap

• No No No. Remember what W3C stands for (Sunday, 30 September)

Kenn Munro

• Opposed to Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

Kenny Graunke

• true standards do not allow patented material (Sunday, 30 September)

Kent Rosenkoetter

• The closing of open standards. (Sunday, 30 September)

Kevin A. Burton

• No patents for W3C technology. (Sunday, 30 September)

Kevin B. McCarty

• "RAND" (Sunday, 30 September)

Kevin Corlette

• RAND is problematic (Sunday, 30 September)

Kevin Dangoor

• Royalty-Free should be required (Monday, 1 October)

KevinO

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Kieran Hand

• RAND Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Kiran Wagle

• Royalties in patents used in standards (Sunday, 30 September)

kiss the sun and walk on air

• RAND Licensing Model -- bad. (Sunday, 30 September)

Kisters

• RAND licensing scheme (Sunday, 30 September)

Konrad Maquestieau

• I don't like the RAND license (Sunday, 30 September)

Kristoffer Ekelund

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Sunday, 30 September)

Krux

• W3C ridiculous new policy on patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Krzysztof Stańkowski

• non-free standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Landahl, Bill

• no RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Lars Eilebrecht

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Lars Forseth

• RE: RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Laurent 'case' Mahieux

• RAND only promotes big companies agenda (Sunday, 30 September)

Lea Gris

• What a shame. Bad shift. Ill fight against it (Sunday, 30 September)

Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra

• RAND License acceptance (Sunday, 30 September)

Lee Bottemiller

• Keep the web open (Sunday, 30 September)

Leon Harris

• paid royalties for standards which use patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Levi

• RAND Licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Lloyd Llewellyn

• How could W3C even THINK of such a thing? (Sunday, 30 September)

Loren Guthrie

• Please do not allow RAND licenses (Sunday, 30 September)

Luca Olivetti

• RAND licensing against opennes of the world wide web (Sunday, 30 September)

Lucas Bajrasz

• Patented technologies inclusion in W3C standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Luke

• I don't agree. (Sunday, 30 September)

Luminescent

• No Patents in Standards Please! (Sunday, 30 September)

Lungo detto il Maltese

• Open Source will RANDel your heads! (Sunday, 30 September)
• It's so simple: We need a new W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

M Carling

• Proposed changes to patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

M U Borchorst

• RAND risks to set W3.org out of play (Sunday, 30 September)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Comments on proposed patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Marc Espie

• NO to RAND patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Marcus Lauer

• Concerns regarding RAND licensing. (Sunday, 30 September)

Margaret Leber

• W3C patent policy (Monday, 1 October)

Mario D. Santana

• Dissent and comment (Saturday, 29 September)

Mark DuPrey

• Objections to RAND provision of the Patent Policy Framework (Saturday, 29 September)

Mark Fasheh

• No to RAND policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Mark Hinds

• No Web Patents! (Sunday, 30 September)

Mark Tearle

• Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

mark@otford.kent.btinternet.co.uk

• RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Martijn Dekker

• Patented standard = oxymoron. A thousand times NO!!! (Sunday, 30 September)

martin f krafft

• comments against (Sunday, 30 September)

Martin Hamilton

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Martin Schlemmer

• patentpolicy comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Martin Wheeler

• RAND proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

Masatake E. Hori

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Monday, 1 October)

massey

• NO PATENTS in STANDARDS (Sunday, 30 September)

mate@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu

• The proposal is very harmful (Sunday, 30 September)

Mathieu Gervais

• You said it better than I can (Sunday, 30 September)

Mats Palmgren

• Any fee is discriminatory (Monday, 1 October)
• Opinion on the RAND license (Monday, 1 October)
• RAND (Monday, 1 October)
• Regarding the RAND license... (Monday, 1 October)

Matt Benjamin

• Ill-Advised Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Matt Greer

• new royalty based standard (Sunday, 30 September)

Matthew Bielanski

• No to RAND (Monday, 1 October)

Matthew Boulos

• Please don't allow patents into standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Matthew Easton

• Patent policy - RAND may be misguided (Sunday, 30 September)

Matthijs Sypkens Smit

• No patents, please! (Sunday, 30 September)

Maurice Rickard

• Against new rules (Sunday, 30 September)

Max Dunn

• Death of the W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

mcnill@talk21.com

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Meredydd

• RAND licencing (Sunday, 30 September)

mesmith@panix.com

• Patent Policy Comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Michael C. Gilbert

• noncommercial perspective (Monday, 1 October)

Michael Greminger

• RAND Hurts Everyone (Monday, 1 October)

Michael H. Voase

• If you start patenting the web, (Sunday, 30 September)

Michael Patrick

• Keep patented technologies out of W3C standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Michael Schaefer

• Don't do it! (Sunday, 30 September)

Michal Kochanowicz

• Comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Michal Politowski

• W3C Patent Policy Comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Michel Koppelaar

• dangerous development (Sunday, 30 September)

Miguel Angel López

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Saturday, 29 September)

Miguel Marcos

• Comments (Sunday, 30 September)

Mika Huurre

• No RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Mike Baptiste

• Will we choose profits at the expense of our students? (Sunday, 30 September)

Mike Brodbelt

• Proposed Changes in W3C patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Mike Coleman

• against w3 patents (Saturday, 29 September)

Mike Keehan

• Proposed Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Mike Lee

• Think ahead (Sunday, 30 September)

Mike Linksvayer

• "Reasonable" is a slipperly slope (Sunday, 30 September)

Mike O'Regan

• W3C Patent Policy Framework (Sunday, 30 September)

Mike Warnecke

• RAND licensing of "patented standards" will kill the web (Monday, 1 October)

Mikko Rauhala

• Does W3C yearn for the bad old days...? (Sunday, 30 September)

Milton Henry

• Loosening requirements for patented technologies (Sunday, 30 September)

MJ Ray

• Against RAND proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

Moore, Louis

• RAND Licensing is a terrible mistake (Sunday, 30 September)

N2URO@aol.com

• Comment Submission for the W3C's Patent Policy Group (Monday, 1 October)

Nathan

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Nathan Culwell-Kanarek

• Don't include patented technology in W3C standards! (Sunday, 30 September)

Nathan Poznick

• Against patented standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Nathan Tuck

• patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Nathaniel Grady

• I implore you not to leave Opensource behind! (Sunday, 30 September)

Neil Harris

• Re: RAND Licensing Concerns (Sunday, 30 September)

Neil Kandalgaonkar

• RAND licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Neil Timms

• Response to RAND - negative (Sunday, 30 September)

Neil Watson

• So much for an independant body (Sunday, 30 September)

Nicolas Mailhot

• Rand policies (Sunday, 30 September)

Nicolas Ouedraogo

• new RAND licensing model comments (Sunday, 30 September)

nicolas.fugier@laposte.net

• Comments about Fee-based Standards for the Web (Sunday, 30 September)

Nicu Pavel

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Niels Svennekjær

• RAND: Friend or foe ? (or is w3c just abolishing themself) (Sunday, 30 September)

Nile Geisinger

• Leaving the W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Noah Hafner

• comments on patented and proprietary "standards" (Sunday, 30 September)

Noah S

• W3C - Please preserve the Web! (Sunday, 30 September)

Norman Megill

• No matter what, make RAND free for Free Open Source software (Sunday, 30 September)

nsmith@holycross.edu

• Proposed patent policy destroys W3C mission (Sunday, 30 September)

Ole Tange

• Patented standards = stifling innovation (Sunday, 30 September)

Oleg

• Les brévets et les standarts (Sunday, 30 September)

Olivier Zendra

• RAND licensing: bad proposal, insufficient consultation (Sunday, 30 September)

oscar

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Sunday, 30 September)

Ovidiu Gheorghioiu

• Please keep the WWW free (Monday, 1 October)

parse@earthlink.net

• WTC wasn't enough? (Sunday, 30 September)

Pat Mahoney

• Against Patents in Standards (Monday, 1 October)

Patrick Lioi

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Sunday, 30 September)

Patrick Logan

• The idea stinks. (Sunday, 30 September)

Patrick Wiseman

• Comment on RAND policy proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

Paul

• No RAND standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Paul Chamberlain

• Please, No (Sunday, 30 September)

Paul Logston

• Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

Paul R. Ganci

• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Paul S. & Germaine K. Mitchell

• Fairness (Sunday, 30 September)

Pawel Krawczyk

• patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

pawel@jerzy.prz.rzeszow.pl

• W3C Patent Policy Framework Comment (Sunday, 30 September)

pbs

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Sunday, 30 September)

pelegrin@labri.fr

• Against RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Pete Birkinshaw

• Open, shared technology, not patents (Monday, 1 October)

Pete Black

• I strongly object to the proposed policy of allowing patented technologies to be used in W3C standards definition (Sunday, 30 September)

Pete Stewart

• Please reconsider this course of action (Sunday, 30 September)

Peter Holt Hoffman

• Patents and standards are mutually exclusive (Sunday, 30 September)

Peter Kelly

• W3C patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Peter Toft

• Comment on proposed patent policy change (Sunday, 30 September)

Peter Wainwright

• RAND licensing and open source software (Sunday, 30 September)

Petter Sundlöf

• Redundancy of any comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Philip Kendall

• RAND licensing model (Sunday, 30 September)

Pierre BRUA

• stop them from crashing the RAND fee plane on the free software towers (Sunday, 30 September)

prhodes@vdsinc.com

• patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

R. Douglas Barbieri

• Please reconsider RAND patent policy... (Sunday, 30 September)

Rafael Avila de Espindola

• WWW death (Sunday, 30 September)

Ragnar Hojland Espinosa

• no! (Sunday, 30 September)

Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez

• The proposal about allowing patents on W3C standards would take away the value of these. (Sunday, 30 September)

Ravi Nanavati

• New patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

ray hartman

• patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

reed mideke

• Public comment system flawed, deadline should be extended (Sunday, 30 September)
• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Refuse

• NO (Sunday, 30 September)

Reuven M. Lerner

• Patents in W3C standards? Egad. (Sunday, 30 September)

Richard A Phillips

• The new W3C patent related policy seems a bad thing (Sunday, 30 September)

Richard Ames

• Please don't allow patents to monopolize SW / the web. (Monday, 1 October)

Richard E. Brown

• I say "NO!" to RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Richard Hillesley

• A terrible idea (Sunday, 30 September)

Richard Moore

• Shameless attempt to commercialise the standards process (Sunday, 30 September)

Richard Suematsu

• What's wrong? These companies can't compete on their own. (Sunday, 30 September)

Richard Thrippleton

• A terrible idea (Sunday, 30 September)

Richard Uhtenwoldt

• Just say no! (Sunday, 30 September)

Richard West

• W3C Patent Policy Framework - bad move (Monday, 1 October)

Rick McDonald

• No Software Patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Riehl, Jonathan (Jonathan)

• Commercial impact of the proposed W3C patent policy. (Sunday, 30 September)

rjh@world.std.com

• Comments on proposed W3 patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

rm

• comment (Sunday, 30 September)

Rob Ewaschuk

• RAND patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Rob Landley

• Proprietary standards. (Sunday, 30 September)

Rob Levin

• Serious problems (Sunday, 30 September)

Robert Gadsdon

• W3C Patents -----> Monopoly Control (Sunday, 30 September)

Robert J. Berger

• No room for patents in standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Robert M. Sexton

• Patent Policy and Free Internet (Rev.1) (Sunday, 30 September)
• Patent Policy and Free Internet (Sunday, 30 September)

Robert O'Callahan

• Effect on Mozilla etc (Sunday, 30 September)

Roberto Mello

• RAND is bad for everyone (Sunday, 30 September)

Robin * Slomkowski

• Do not allow patents into w3c standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Robin Mead

• RAND Licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Robin Snader

• Proposed RAND Policy (Monday, 1 October)

Rod Mckenzie

• Regarding the patent policy recommendation. (Monday, 1 October)

Rodent of Unusual Size

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)
• W3C betrayal of principles (Sunday, 30 September)

Rodney Orpheus

• W3C propsed patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Rodrigo P. Gomez

• What are you guys smoking? (Sunday, 30 September)

Ron Nath

• Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Ross Werner

• Patent Policy Change (Sunday, 30 September)

Roy Barling

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Roy Carlson

• Patents and the W3C - NO ! (Sunday, 30 September)

Rufus Polson

• RAND licensing and the future of W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Russ Magee

• Proposed new RAND Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Russell Nelson

• No. (Monday, 1 October)

Ryan Myers

• Comment on "reasonable and non-discriminatory" patent system (Sunday, 30 September)

s

• The Internet was developed for the Free exchange of Information - not big business (Sunday, 30 September)

Samantha Atkins

• utterly wrong (Sunday, 30 September)

Samuel Hart

• Against W3C Patent Policy (RAND) (Sunday, 30 September)

Sara Yurman

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

sbalneav@e-brz.com

• W3C's Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Scott Hansohn

• Comments re: http://www.w3.org/2001/08/16-PP-FAQ.html (Sunday, 30 September)

Scott Maxwell

• RAND considered harmful (Sunday, 30 September)

Scott Patten

• Please say no to patented tech (Sunday, 30 September)

Scott Prive

• W3 Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

scottr

• Fee-Bound W3C Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Sean

• Why I Discourage Patented Standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Sean Borman

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Sean Middleditch

• RAND: hat about everyone else? (Sunday, 30 September)

Seth Delackner

• Please, no patented material in W3C standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Seth Johnson

• Patents and the W3C (Monday, 1 October)
• [Fwd: [fairuse] My letter to the W3C: Please do not allow any W3C standard to beencumbered by patents.] (Sunday, 30 September)

Seth Nickell

• Please extend the comment period (Sunday, 30 September)
• "Standards" with licensing restrictions disasterous to free software (Sunday, 30 September)

Shad Van Den Hul

• [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> (Sunday, 30 September)

shane

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Shaun Savage

• Money will do more to destroy the web the goverments. (Saturday, 29 September)

Shawn Balestracci

• RAND would stifle innovation and hurt consumer choice (Sunday, 30 September)

Shawn Lindsay

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Shawn Quinn

• I'm horrified. (Sunday, 30 September)

Shawn Stamps

• Comment on inclusion of patented technologies in standards: JUST SAY NO! (Sunday, 30 September)

Shawn Starr

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Sheryl Coe

• No to Patents, Yes to Discrimination (Sunday, 30 September)

Sidney Felder

• Comment on Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Simo Sorce

• Please do not allow patented standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Simon Hill

• W3C Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

sinster@ballistictech.net

• Objections to proposed patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Slater, Christopher M

• I am against this policy (Monday, 1 October)

Smitty

• Proposal to allow patent-bound WWW standards (Sunday, 30 September)

smokedjam

• patented standards (Monday, 1 October)

ss@technicalpursuit.com

• RAND Licencing (Sunday, 30 September)

Stanley A. Klein

• Comment on proposed "RAND" policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Stanley Krute

• royalty free standards only, please (Sunday, 30 September)

Stefan

• Let's stick together! (Monday, 1 October)

Stefane Fermigier

• Re: Comment on proposed patent policy change (Sunday, 30 September)

Stephen Drye

• RAND license is effectively impossible (Sunday, 30 September)

Stephen Moore

• Don't do RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Stephen R. Savitzky

• Opposed to proposed patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

steve

• w3c nonsense (Sunday, 30 September)

Steve Ball

• Royalty bound patents in web standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Steve Jorgensen

• RAND policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Steve Smith

• On Allowing RAND licensing to be used by W3C standards (Monday, 1 October)

Steve Yurman

• I oppose RAND (Monday, 1 October)

Steven Barker

• In opposition to RAND licenses (Monday, 1 October)

Steven Kang

• Public Comment RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Stig E Sandoe

• The patent-policy change (RAND) (Sunday, 30 September)

Stuart Ellis

• Unquantifiable Liability ? An Objection to the Patent Proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

Susan

• Rand Comments (Monday, 1 October)

Susan Lesch

• Comments for WD-patent-policy-20010816 (Monday, 24 September)

Sylvester Chwastyk

• Open and Free (Sunday, 30 September)

T. Thompson

• LT: NO to W3C RAND Proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

T.D.

• LT: NO to RAND Proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

tbreuel@parc.xerox.com

• patent policy comments (Sunday, 30 September)

Terje Kvernes

• RAND? please just don't. (Sunday, 30 September)

The Nose Who Knows

• Patents and royalties are the antithesis of the Web's openness (Monday, 1 October)

The Plumblys

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Theo de Raadt

• Please extend the comment deadline (Sunday, 30 September)
• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Thomas Strauss

• against patent-fees in w3c standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Thomas Worthington

• RAND and the W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Thomas Zander

• patents (Sunday, 30 September)

Thompson Hayner

• simple analysis (Sunday, 30 September)

Tim

• Thanks A Lot, Folks (Sunday, 30 September)

Tim Bray

• Policy vs. mechanism (Sunday, 30 September)

Tim Holy

• RAND (Monday, 1 October)

Tim Krieglstein

• RAND policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Tim Sweeney

• W3C Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Timo <Blazko> Boewing

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: NO (Sunday, 30 September)

Tobias Gloth

• I believe RAND is a bad idea (Sunday, 30 September)

Toby & Toni Meehan

• RAND & intellectual property (Sunday, 30 September)

Toby Haynes

• W3C - turning it's back on the reasons that the Internet has thrived? (Sunday, 30 September)

Todd C. Miller

• Please keep web standards royalty free (Sunday, 30 September)

Tom Bruns

• RAND will kill the Web (Sunday, 30 September)

Tom Bryan

• Concerns about future fees for already implemented standards. (Sunday, 30 September)

Tom Cooper

• W3C Patent Policy: Bad for W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

Tom Epperly

• Reject RAND proposal (Sunday, 30 September)

Tom Forsythe

• Comments on your Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Tom Hinton

• RE: Patent policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Tom McDonald

• RAND policy (Sunday, 30 September)

tom poe

• Your Utter Arrogance is Showing (Saturday, 29 September)

Tom Swiss

• patented technologies in W3C standards (Sunday, 30 September)

Tomas Pospisek

• W3C appointing Microsoft, Apple, HP & Phillips to dig it's grave (Sunday, 30 September)

Tomasz Kwiatkowski

• Web standards should be patent-free (Sunday, 30 September)

Tony O'Bryan

• RAND Licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Tony Sellers

• NO patents in standards (Monday, 1 October)

Tony Stieber

• RAND considered harmful (Sunday, 30 September)

TopXML - Mark Wilson

• This is a bad policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Total Computer Solutions

• AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL! (Sunday, 30 September)

TQ White II

• I oppose RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

tres

• Patent Policy (Sunday, 30 September)

Tuomas Lukka

• Accepting for-fee-patents is a VERY bad idea (Sunday, 30 September)

unprivileged user

• RAND policy (Sunday, 30 September)

User FWC

• RAND initiative (Sunday, 30 September)

VanL

• Comments Regarding RAND Wroking draft (Sunday, 30 September)

Vicente A.S. Werner

• A good hit to the open & free nature of web development (Sunday, 30 September)

Victoria Helms

• Re: Fee-based standards for the web (Sunday, 30 September)

Vincent Crespi

• Atrong opposition (Monday, 1 October)

Vincent Joseph

• RAND objection (Sunday, 30 September)

Vincent Marcus

• RAND Licenses (Sunday, 30 September)

Volker Hett

• RAND Licensing (Sunday, 30 September)

Vox

• Re: W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users (Sunday, 30 September)

w3c-comment@terc.edu

• Comment on patent policy proposal (Monday, 1 October)

w3ccomment@nickwillson.com

• Patent Policy Framework (Sunday, 30 September)

Wally Trenholm

• IMHO: Patents have no place in W3C (Sunday, 30 September)

Walt Leipold

• For shame! (Sunday, 30 September)

warren

• Patent Policy: bad for everybody except big biz (Sunday, 30 September)

wchackett

• patentpolicy (Sunday, 30 September)

Web User

• FUCKING UNBELIEVABLE (Sunday, 30 September)

Wendell Schubert

• No to RAND license (Sunday, 30 September)

Wes McDermott

• Proposed W3C Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

Will Janoschka

• Patent Policy (Monday, 1 October)

Wolfram Tempel

• comment (Sunday, 30 September)

x

• About the RAND license (Monday, 1 October)
• Regarding RAND license... (Monday, 1 October)
• RAND license sucks (Monday, 1 October)

Xabi Ochotorena

• Speech freedom menaced (Sunday, 30 September)

Xavi Drudis Ferran

• RAND = W3C suicide (Sunday, 30 September)

Yanko Kaneti

• RAND licensing and WWW standards - another vote against this atrocity (Sunday, 30 September)

Yaron M. Minsky

• Concerns about RAND licensing terms (Sunday, 30 September)

Yong Chi

• comments on rand (Sunday, 30 September)

Zak McGregor

• A few further points (Monday, 1 October)
• Disturbing (Sunday, 30 September)

Zavier Sheran

• RAND (Sunday, 30 September)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:57:46 UTC