- From: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <jhm@cistron.nl>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 16:20:26 +0200
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Lectori Salutem, As a long term user of the web, I've come to respect W3C's efforts to prevent the web falling apart into mutually incompatble systems. While not always successful (many sites still rely on vendor "extensions"), the W3C has so far had the impartiality and openness to ensure the web would continue to be founded on open standards rather than become dominated by the interests of proprietary software vendors. I'm shocked and dismayed to learn that W3C is seriously considering weakening its stance on software patents to allow W3C recommendationts to be covered by patents under RAND licensing terms. If this change takes place, W3C willingly and actively disposes of its vendor neutrality, and its recommendations will lose their value to the free software community. The free software community has proven itself capable of setting up open standards and open implementations where vendors attempted to end free standards (cf. the X11R6 license change and the XFree86 project's response), but it is also acutely aware of the duplication of effort such actions require. Please do not force the free software community to take such steps. I urge you to do your utmost to prevent further fragmentation of the web by continuing to keep W3C recommendations implementable as free software without requiring payment to patent holders and thereby keeping the W3C relevant as the web's standards body and allowing the free software community to continue to help make the web accessible to all, in particular to those in the developing world. Ray Dassen -- LEADERSHIP A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with auto- destructive imaginations in order to ensure that when it comes to the crunch it'll be someone else's bones which go crack and not their own. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2001 10:20:28 UTC