- From: Alex Jacques <sashajon@optonline.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 14:24:52 -0500
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
I strongly believe that any change to the current RF policy, RAND or otherwise, should be rejected outright. As W3C has demonstrated perhaps more successfully than any other standards organization, a strict RF policy is key to the most successful adoption of standards. A RAND approach would have rendered HTTP and HTML "yet another standard" instead of the universal protocol for the Web. Indeed the Web as we know it would probably never have come into existence, as competing patent holders sought ways to collect revenues from their approach rather than pay for HTTP/HTML. History has demonstrated this repeatedly. In the long run it is to the detriment of commercial interests as well as users. Today is no different than yesterday - there are no indispensable patented technologies for W3C standards. The introduction of patented technologies into W3C standards will simply lead to successful efforts to work around them, just as the GIF patent problems lead to PNG. However it would be a shame to see such a well respected standards body as W3C become yet another politically driven effort to ensconce patent claims. This would simply lead to W3C being bypassed.
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2001 14:24:52 UTC