- From: Andrew Bennetts <andrew@puzzling.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 20:03:46 +1000
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
I have just read the article at http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-09-30-001-20-NW-CY and would like to voice my opinion on the issue. Standards should remain free to use. Requiring royalties or similar fees undermines the value of a standard -- it adds a significant doubt in the mind of a developer (whether or not they are commercial) about the viability of the standard, and so would promote free standards that would compete with standards that require payment. This seems to me to be detrimental to the purpose of W3C. I am also greatly concerned about the potential for removing the "level playing field" that is provided by free standards. Free standards do not discriminate against any vendor, developer or user. Royalties would change that. It is of great concern to me that such a scheme could potentially bar "open source" developers from supporting such standards, isolating them from the rest of the computing world and causing needless interoperability issues. Please reconsider this policy, and reject it. It is not in the best interests of the W3C, or of the World Wide Web to adopt this policy. Please examine this policy with respect to the goals stated at http://www.w3.org/Consortium/ and do the right thing by the internet community. This policy will harm all three of W3C's goals as stated on that page: Universal Access, Semantic Web, and Web of Trust. Thank you for your time. If this is not the appropriate place to voice my opinion, please let me know what is. Regards, Andrew Bennetts User of, and developer for, the World Wide Web.
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2001 06:14:38 UTC