public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2004 by date

Thursday, 30 December 2004

• Re: Suggested modification for CONSTRUCT Kendall Clark

Thursday, 23 December 2004

• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Steve Harris
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Steve Harris

Wednesday, 22 December 2004

• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Pat Hayes
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Pat Hayes
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Pat Hayes
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Pat Hayes
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? Steve Harris
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? Steve Harris
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Steve Harris
• Re: RDF/ML and testcases Seaborne, Andy
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: specify the language without reference to implementation; keep inference orthogonal Seaborne, Andy
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases Seaborne, Andy
• RDF/ML and testcases Steve Harris
• specify the language without reference to implementation; keep inference orthogonal Dan Connolly
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Steve Harris
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) Dan Connolly
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases Dan Connolly
• Re: UNSAID + inference tests Steve Harris
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Steve Harris
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Seaborne, Andy
• UNSAID - two test cases Seaborne, Andy
• Re: F2F4 information Janne Saarela
• Apologies Pat Hayes
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Pat Hayes
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL Pat Hayes
• DAWG ftf5 and W3C tech plenary registration Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 21 December 2004

• Re: F2F4 information Dan Connolly
• Re: UNSAID + inference tests Dan Connolly
• Re: UNSAID + inference tests Steve Harris
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Steve Harris
• UNSAID + inference tests Steve Harris
• Re: data consistency tests with UNSAID and OPTIONAL Steve Harris
• Re: Abstract protocol URIs Dan Connolly
• data consistency tests with UNSAID and OPTIONAL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Abstract protocol URIs Kendall Clark
• Re: [Protocol] was: Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 Kendall Clark
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 Tom Adams
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? Steve Harris
• [Protocol] was: Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 Seaborne, Andy
• Abstract protocol URIs Dan Connolly
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 Kendall Clark

Monday, 20 December 2004

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Seaborne, Andy
• agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review Dave Beckett

Sunday, 19 December 2004

• Re: Suggested modification for CONSTRUCT Steve Harris
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Steve Harris
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) Dan Connolly
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL Dan Connolly
• Suggested modification for CONSTRUCT Pat Hayes
• Re: ACTION: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax Pat Hayes
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL Pat Hayes
• Re: CONSTRUCT / template merging. Pat Hayes

Friday, 17 December 2004

• Re: Small items for SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Small items for SPARQL Kendall Clark
• RE: tests and inference? jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: Small items for SPARQL Dan Connolly
• Re: Small items for SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Scribe apology Dan Connolly
• Re: Small items for SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: query parameter name clashes? Dan Connolly
• Re: Small items for SPARQL Dan Connolly
• Re: query parameter name clashes? Steve Harris
• Re: Small items for SPARQL Steve Harris
• Re: query parameter name clashes? Kendall Clark
• Small items for SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: query parameter name clashes? Seaborne, Andy
• query parameter name clashes? Kendall Clark
• Proposed replacement tests for those tests with ?foo, ?Bar Dave Beckett
• Re: Rough sparql protocol and result format hack Steve Harris
• Re: Rough sparql protocol and result format hack Steve Harris

Thursday, 16 December 2004

• Re: Rough sparql protocol and result format hack Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Rough sparql protocol and result format hack Kendall Clark
• Re: tests and inference? Kendall Clark
• Rough sparql protocol and result format hack Steve Harris
• Re: tests and inference? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: tests and inference? Kendall Clark
• Re: tests and inference? Steve Harris
• Re: tests and inference? Dan Connolly
• Re: tests and inference? Seaborne, Andy
• Scribe apology Tom Adams
• Re: tests and inference? Kendall Clark
• Re: tests and inference? Dan Connolly
• Re: tests and inference? Steve Harris
• Re: tests and inference? Kendall Clark
• Re: tests and inference? Dan Connolly
• Re: tests and inference? Kendall Clark
• Re: tests and inference? Kendall Clark
• RE: tests and inference? Thompson, Bryan B.
• RE: tests and inference? Dan Connolly
• RE: tests and inference? Thompson, Bryan B.
• Protocol review status and belated regrets Tom Adams
• Definition of constraint? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: tests and inference? Seaborne, Andy
• RE: tests and inference? Thompson, Bryan B.
• Re: tests and inference? Seaborne, Andy

Wednesday, 15 December 2004

• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review Dave Beckett
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review Dave Beckett
• Re: ACTION: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? jos.deroo@agfa.com

Tuesday, 14 December 2004

• Re: tests and inference? Dan Connolly
• SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? Dan Connolly
• Re: review comment for SARQL (5 nested patterns) Seaborne, Andy
• do-over on test approval Dan Connolly
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Dec (minutes) Dan Connolly
• review comment for SARQL (5 nested patterns) Hiroyuki Sato
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review Simon Raboczi
• Re: ACTION: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax Kendall Clark
• Re: Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks Steve Harris
• Re: Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
• Re: tests around comparators in the graph constraint Steve Harris
• Re: Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks Steve Harris
• ACTION: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax Simon Raboczi
• Re: tests around comparators in the graph constraint Dave Beckett
• Re: Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
• Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
• tests around comparators in the graph constraint Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ACTION: EricP migrate some Algae UnionDisjunciton test cases Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 13 December 2004

• agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Dec Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review Seaborne, Andy
• Test cases for SOURCE and NAMED Dave Beckett
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review Dan Connolly
• Re: Updated DAWG variable binding results XML format Dave Beckett
• non-XML format - Turtle document, for review Dave Beckett
• SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review Dave Beckett
• Re: Updated DAWG variable binding results XML format Kendall Clark
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL jos.deroo@agfa.com

Saturday, 11 December 2004

• Re: what does SPARQL stand for? (issues#languageProtocolName) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: what does SPARQL stand for? (issues#languageProtocolName) Dave Beckett
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 10 December 2004

• dependency on XQuery Dan Connolly
• what does SPARQL stand for? (issues#languageProtocolName) Dan Connolly
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL Seaborne, Andy
• CONSTRUCT / template merging. Seaborne, Andy
• UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 9 December 2004

• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated Seaborne, Andy
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) Kendall Clark
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated Kendall Clark
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) Dan Connolly
• Re: "non-XML" RDF format Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: "non-XML" RDF format Kendall Clark
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated Seaborne, Andy
• Re: "non-XML" RDF format Dave Beckett
• Re: "non-XML" RDF format Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-12-07 for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-12-07 for review Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 8 December 2004

• Re: TKS/Kowari named graph usage Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Untrusted graphs - examples jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: apologies and regrets Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 7 December 2004

• Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset Seaborne, Andy
• optional clauses: vivid test case Dan Connolly
• Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset Dan Connolly
• Re: apologies and regrets (and SPARQL definitions) Dan Connolly
• TKS/Kowari named graph usage Tom Adams
• [Fwd: Clothing for Finland] Dan Connolly
• Regrets for 7-12-2004 teleconference Janne Saarela
• Re: Regrets for dawg 2004-12-07 telcon Dan Connolly
• Regrets for dawg 2004-12-07 telcon Dave Beckett
• Untrusted graphs - examples Seaborne, Andy
• Re: alternative result format using collections - avoid use/mention issues Seaborne, Andy
• apologies and regrets Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (in progress) Hiroyuki Sato
• regrets for the rest of 2004 Howard Katz

Monday, 6 December 2004

• Re: alternative result format using collections - avoid use/mention issues Dan Connolly
• alternative result format using collections - avoid use/mention issues jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (in progress) Alberto Reggiori
• sparql protocol simplex updated Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec Dan Connolly
• test case approval reflected in manifest? Dan Connolly
• Re: scribe for tomorrow? (7 Dec) Dan Connolly
• Re: scribe for tomorrow? (7 Dec) Kendall Clark
• scribe for tomorrow? (7 Dec) Dan Connolly
• agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (in progress) Dan Connolly
• Regrets for tomorrow. Farrukh Najmi
• Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset jos.deroo@agfa.com

Friday, 3 December 2004

• Re: "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match Dan Connolly
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 2 December 2004

• Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset Seaborne, Andy
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Yoshio's review Seaborne, Andy
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 Dan Connolly
• Re: Yoshio's review Dan Connolly
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Yoshio's review Seaborne, Andy
• Minutes of the 2004-11-30 DAWG teleconference Janne Saarela
• Re: F2F4 information Janne Saarela

Wednesday, 1 December 2004

• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 Kevin Wilkinson
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 30 November 2004

• Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset Dan Connolly
• Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset Tom Adams
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Yoshio's review Seaborne, Andy
• feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 Kevin Wilkinson
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 30 Nov Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 30 Nov Howard Katz

Monday, 29 November 2004

• Re: Proposal: querying untrusted graphs jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Yoshio's review Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
• agenda: RDF Data Access 30 Nov Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: let's approve 8 tests: triple-pattern-001 thru example-2-4a jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: let's approve 8 tests: triple-pattern-001 thru example-2-4a Dan Connolly
• test cases play group Eric Prud'hommeaux
• relative URIs in RDF/XML (for test manifests) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: let's approve 8 tests: triple-pattern-001 thru example-2-4a jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Proposal: querying untrusted graphs Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Agenda/chair 30Nov Dan Connolly
• Agenda/chair 30Nov Dan Connolly
• let's approve 8 tests: triple-pattern-001 thru example-2-4a Dan Connolly

Friday, 26 November 2004

• Re: Issue with the result set format Kendall Clark
• Re: Issue with the result set format Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Updated DAWG variable binding results XML format Kendall Clark
• Re: Issue with the result set format Kendall Clark
• Re: Indicating bNodes in XML result sets Seaborne, Andy
• Updated DAWG variable binding results XML format Dave Beckett
• Re: Indicating bNodes in XML result sets Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue with the result set format Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Issue with the result set format Dave Beckett

Thursday, 25 November 2004

• [Fwd: SPARQL: SOURCE is suboptimal] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: DESCRIBE - description of a resource Alberto Reggiori

Wednesday, 24 November 2004

• Re: "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match Seaborne, Andy
• Re: puzzled by Pattern Solution 2nd sentence Seaborne, Andy
• Re: puzzled by Query Solution defn Seaborne, Andy
• Re: are SOURCE consumers OK with it being optional? Dave Beckett
• Re: let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns Dave Beckett
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft Dave Beckett

Tuesday, 23 November 2004

• Re: Minutes of 2004-11-23 teleconference for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Minutes of 2004-11-23 teleconference for review Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Permanent model names in TKS/Kowari Tom Adams
• Regrets for 2004-11-30 telecon Steve Harris
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 23 Nov jos.deroo@agfa.com
• RE: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq Seaborne, Andy
• Re: DESCRIBE - description of a resource Dan Connolly

Monday, 22 November 2004

• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft Dan Connolly
• DESCRIBE - description of a resource Alberto Reggiori
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq Dan Connolly
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq Seaborne, Andy
• regrets Alberto Reggiori
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq Dan Connolly
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq Seaborne, Andy
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq Dan Connolly
• Issue with the result set format Seaborne, Andy
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq Seaborne, Andy
• Re: "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match Seaborne, Andy
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft Kendall Clark
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft Seaborne, Andy
• Re: protocol draft available Kendall Clark
• Re: protocol draft available Kendall Clark
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access 23 Nov Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns Seaborne, Andy
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft Seaborne, Andy
• are SOURCE consumers OK with it being optional? Dan Connolly
• Re: protocol draft available Seaborne, Andy

Sunday, 21 November 2004

• Re: protocol draft available Tom Adams
• Minutes of 2004-11-16 teleconference for review Simon Raboczi
• Re: let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns Simon Raboczi
• Re: Permanent model names in TKS/Kowari Dan Connolly
• Permanent model names in TKS/Kowari Tom Adams
• URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq Dan Connolly

Saturday, 20 November 2004

• puzzled by Query Solution defn Dan Connolly
• puzzled by Pattern Solution 2nd sentence Dan Connolly
• "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match Dan Connolly
• Re: protocol draft available Tom Adams
• let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns Dan Connolly

Friday, 19 November 2004

• Re: minutes and next week's meeting? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• regrets for dawg telcons 2004-11-23, 2004-11-30 Dave Beckett
• protocol: updated (radically changed) draft Kendall Clark
• minutes and next week's meeting? Kendall Clark

Wednesday, 17 November 2004

• regrets Howard Katz

Tuesday, 16 November 2004

• regrests Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Alberto Reggiori
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Alberto Reggiori
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION Seaborne, Andy
• Constrinat synatx (was Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION Simon Raboczi
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION Simon Raboczi
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 15 November 2004

• Re: protocol draft available Kendall Clark
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 16 Nov Seaborne, Andy
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION Simon Raboczi
• agenda: RDF Data Access 16 Nov Eric Prud'hommeaux
• OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION Eric Prud'hommeaux

Sunday, 14 November 2004

• Re: protocol draft available Janne Saarela

Saturday, 13 November 2004

• RE: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements jos.deroo@agfa.com

Friday, 12 November 2004

• Re: protocol draft available Steve Harris
• Re: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd:Re:...]] Seaborne, Andy
• Test cases for $ and ? (was: Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-11-09 for review) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: protocol draft available Seaborne, Andy
• RE: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 11 November 2004

• Re: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution Seaborne, Andy

Friday, 12 November 2004

• Re: protocol draft available jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: protocol draft available Kendall Clark

Thursday, 11 November 2004

• Re: protocol draft available Kendall Clark
• Re: protocol draft available jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: protocol draft available Dan Connolly
• Re: test cases for SPARQL CONSTRUCT jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: protocol draft available Kendall Clark
• Re: test cases for SPARQL CONSTRUCT Seaborne, Andy
• test cases for SPARQL CONSTRUCT jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: protocol draft available Seaborne, Andy
• Re: protocol draft available Seaborne, Andy
• Indicating bNodes in XML result sets Seaborne, Andy
• Implementation of the DAWG specs (was: Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-11-09 for review) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: protocol draft available Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Steve Harris
• Re: Work in progress on rq23 Steve Harris

Wednesday, 10 November 2004

• Helsinki DAWG ftf4: attendance planning Dan Connolly
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-11-09 for review Farrukh Najmi
• RE: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re:...]] Dan Connolly
• RE: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re:...]] Seaborne, Andy
• Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-11-09 for review Dave Beckett
• Re: protocol draft available Kendall Clark
• Re: protocol draft available Steve Harris

Tuesday, 9 November 2004

• demo services, toys to play with: DawgShows 1/2 ;-) Dan Connolly
• Re: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements Seaborne, Andy
• Re: protocol draft available Dan Connolly
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov Howard Katz
• XML 2004 in DC -- attending? Kendall Clark
• Re: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements Dan Connolly
• protocol draft available Kendall Clark
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov Alberto Reggiori
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Work in progress on rq23 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov Yoshio Fukushige
• Re: commas or no commas (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Steve Harris
• Re: Work in propgress on rq23 Steve Harris
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov Hiroyuki Sato
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Steve Harris
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Steve Harris

Monday, 8 November 2004

• agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov Dan Connolly
• agenda 9 Nov delayed Dan Connolly
• RE: SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Dan Connolly
• SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements Dave Beckett
• RE: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Seaborne, Andy
• Work in propgress on rq23 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Kendall Clark
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Kendall Clark
• RE: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Dave Beckett
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Dave Beckett
• RE: SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Dave Beckett
• RE: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Seaborne, Andy
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Kendall Clark
• RE: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Seaborne, Andy
• commas or no commas (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Dave Beckett
• objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) Dave Beckett
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Kendall Clark
• SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues Dave Beckett

Friday, 5 November 2004

• RE: A present for Guy Fawkes night Seaborne, Andy
• RE: A present for Guy Fawkes night Seaborne, Andy
• Re: A present for Guy Fawkes night Dan Connolly
• A present for Guy Fawkes night Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Comments on SPARQL draft Simon Raboczi

Thursday, 4 November 2004

• Appologies for 2004-11-09 telecon Steve Harris
• Re: literals as numbers (Was: Re: Comments on SPARQL draft) jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: literals as numbers (Was: Re: Comments on SPARQL draft) Janne Saarela
• RE: literals as numbers (Was: Re: Comments on SPARQL draft) Seaborne, Andy

Wednesday, 3 November 2004

• literals as numbers (Was: Re: Comments on SPARQL draft) Alberto Reggiori
• Re: FW: Comments on SPARQL draft Janne Saarela
• FW: Comments on SPARQL draft Seaborne, Andy
• F2F4 information Janne Saarela

Tuesday, 2 November 2004

• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-11-02 for review Alberto Reggiori
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 2 Nov (in progress; suggestions?) jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: Minutes of DAWG telecon 2004-10-26 for review Tom Adams
• Regrets for today Farrukh Najmi
• regrets for RDF Data Access 2 Nov Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ws-policy use caes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: Comments in SPARQL Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• RE: Comments in SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Comments in SPARQL Steve Harris
• Re: Comments in SPARQL Alberto Reggiori
• Re: Comments in SPARQL Dave Beckett
• Comments in SPARQL Dave Beckett
• DAWG test manifests need classes for encoding file formats Dave Beckett

Monday, 1 November 2004

• RE: Minutes of DAWG telecon 2004-10-26 for review Howard Katz
• ACTION: SteveH to take rs:size out of expected results from all tests Steve Harris
• Re: Minutes of DAWG telecon 2004-10-26 for review Kendall Clark
• Minutes of DAWG telecon 2004-10-26 for review Tom Adams
• agenda: RDF Data Access 2 Nov (in progress; suggestions?) Dan Connolly
• teleconferences in November Dan Connolly
• Re: use a QName as variable identifier Alberto Reggiori
• use a QName as variable identifier Alberto Reggiori
• Re: Illustratation of prefix interaction details Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Draft: open issues around '?' use. Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 26 October 2004

• 14:30Z, DAWG telcon, and you Dan Connolly
• oops! didn't get back to disjunction Dan Connolly
• Technical Plenary F2F scheduling Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Simple source tests Alberto Reggiori
• regrets Howard Katz
• Re: test case details by 26 Oct telcon Alberto Reggiori
• towards automation of DAWG tests machinery Alberto Reggiori
• regrets Kendall Clark
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Oct Janne Saarela
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Oct Alberto Reggiori
• Re: mail-speak [was: Draft: open issues around '?' use.] Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• some real-world SOURCE test cases Alberto Reggiori

Monday, 25 October 2004

• Re: mail-speak [was: Draft: open issues around '?' use.] jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Rasqal with SPARQL Dave Beckett
• agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Oct Dan Connolly
• Re: Draft: open issues around '?' use. Dirk-Willem van Gulik

Sunday, 24 October 2004

• minutes: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (non-IRC version) Simon Raboczi

Monday, 25 October 2004

• SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback Dave Beckett
• mail-speak [was: Draft: open issues around '?' use.] Dan Connolly
• Re: Illustratation of prefix interaction details Steve Harris
• Regrets for tomorrow Hiroyuki Sato
• Re: Draft: open issues around '?' use. Kendall Clark
• Re: Draft: open issues around '?' use. Dave Beckett
• Re: Illustratation of prefix interaction details Dave Beckett
• minutes: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (non-IRC version) Dan Connolly
• RE: SPARQL Query WD 20041012 examples Seaborne, Andy
• Illustratation of prefix interaction details Dave Beckett
• Draft: open issues around '?' use. Dirk-Willem van Gulik

Friday, 22 October 2004

• minutes: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (irc log) Dan Connolly
• RFE: sparql server Dan Connolly

Thursday, 21 October 2004

• Re: input to WSDL, since we're using it in SPARQL? jos.deroo@agfa.com
• test case details by 26 Oct telcon Dan Connolly
• Re: input to WSDL, since we're using it in SPARQL? Kendall Clark

Wednesday, 20 October 2004

• input to WSDL, since we're using it in SPARQL? Dan Connolly
• Re: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re: ...]] Kendall Clark

Tuesday, 19 October 2004

• Re: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re: ...]] jos.deroo@agfa.com
• definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re: ...]] Dan Connolly
• Re: [Fwd: Re: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: 3store+rdf store compatability tests added Seaborne, Andy
• Sample iTQL queries and result formats for subqueries vs. disjunction Tom Adams
• Re: Simple source tests Kendall Clark
• Re: Simple source tests Seaborne, Andy
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: minutes for 10-12-2004 meeting Alberto Reggiori
• Re: Simple source tests Steve Harris
• SPARQL Query WD 20041012 examples Dave Beckett
• Re: Simple source tests Kendall Clark
• Regret for today Farrukh Najmi
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct jos.deroo@agfa.com
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct Howard Katz
• tolog: a query language for topic maps Simon Raboczi

Monday, 18 October 2004

• Re: protocol draft -- update Dan Connolly
• protocol draft -- update Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct Dan Connolly
• minutes for 10-12-2004 meeting Kendall Clark
• Re: [Fwd: Re: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL] Steve Harris

Sunday, 17 October 2004

• [Fwd: Coments on first working draft of SPARQL] Seaborne, Andy
• [Fwd: Re: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL] Seaborne, Andy

Friday, 15 October 2004

• Re: SELECT and constants: (was RE: Simple source tests) Steve Harris
• Re: dawg-source-simple-* Dave Beckett
• SELECT and constants: (was RE: Simple source tests) Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Simple source tests Seaborne, Andy
• dawg-source-simple-* Steve Harris
• Re: Simple source tests Steve Harris
• 3store+rdf store compatability tests added Steve Harris
• RE: Simple source tests Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 14 October 2004

• Re: Simple source tests (file: URIs in test materials) Steve Harris
• Re: Simple source tests Dan Connolly
• Re: Simple source tests (file: URIs in test materials) Dan Connolly
• Re: Simple source tests Dan Connolly
• Re: Simple source tests Steve Harris
• Simple source tests Seaborne, Andy
• hmm, I could do w/out this reference to... Kendall Clark

Wednesday, 13 October 2004

• Re: Preliminary material for section "value testing" Steve Harris
• Re: Preliminary material for section "value testing" Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Preliminary material for section "value testing" Steve Harris
• RE: Preliminary material for section "value testing" Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 12 October 2004

• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" Matthieu Fuzellier
• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" Kendall Clark
• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query Seaborne, Andy
• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" Matthieu Fuzellier
• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" Eric Prud'hommeaux
• regrets Howard Katz
• Preliminary material for section "value testing" Seaborne, Andy
• Regrets for todays meeting 10/12/2004 Farrukh Najmi
• Re: Status update on SPARQL Language document Kevin Wilkinson

Monday, 11 October 2004

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 12 Aug Tom Adams
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query Seaborne, Andy
• agenda: RDF Data Access 12 Aug Dan Connolly
• scribe for 12 Oct 2004 telecon Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Status update on SPARQL Language document Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Simon Raboczi
• Re: Another alternative to OR Steve Harris
• Re: Status update on SPARQL Language document Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Another alternative to OR Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Another alternative to OR Steve Harris
• Re: Another alternative to OR Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Seaborne, Andy

Sunday, 10 October 2004

• Re: Status update on SPARQL Language document Kevin Wilkinson
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Simon Raboczi
• Re: comments/questions on SPARQL document Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 8 October 2004

• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] Howard Katz
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] Howard Katz
• RE: Status update on SPARQL Language document Howard Katz
• Status update on SPARQL Language document Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Seaborne, Andy
• Re: comments/questions on SPARQL document Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Simon Raboczi
• Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary" resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic web... Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] Howard Katz

Thursday, 7 October 2004

• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] Eric Prud'hommeaux
• uc&r 1.140 for publication Kendall Clark
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? Tom Adams
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Dave Beckett
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Dave Beckett
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Dave Beckett
• RE: unsaid/not: any champions? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? Tom Adams

Wednesday, 6 October 2004

• regrets for telcon 2004-10-12 jos.deroo@agfa.com
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] Howard Katz
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Seaborne, Andy
• regrets for telcon 2004-10-12 Alberto Reggiori
• regrets for telcon 2004-10-12 Dave Beckett
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 5 October 2004

• Re: Variable in SOURCE (Was Re: A few simple tests) jos.deroo@agfa.com
• comments/questions on SPARQL document Pat Hayes
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-10-05 Janne Saarela
• Variable in SOURCE (Was Re: A few simple tests) Seaborne, Andy
• bNodes in named graphs Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query Tom Adams
• Comments from SWBP&D WG Tom Adams
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] Howard Katz
• Another alternative to OR Steve Harris
• Re: UC&R ready for review Alberto Reggiori
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query Alberto Reggiori
• Re: UC&R ready for review Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• Re: Named Containers / was: Re: UC&R ready for review Steve Harris
• Re: UC&R ready for review Seaborne, Andy
• Named Containers / was: Re: UC&R ready for review Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Oct Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 4 October 2004

• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: UC&R ready for review Alberto Reggiori
• Re: UC&R ready for review Kendall Clark
• Re: UC&R ready for review Pat Hayes
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? Steve Harris
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? Kendall Clark
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? Steve Harris
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Howard Katz
• Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Dave Beckett
• Re: FW: URI string substructure queries - labelling/filtering use case Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Dave Beckett

Saturday, 2 October 2004

• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Dan Connolly
• Re: CBD - Concise Bounded Description - Member Submission from Nokia Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: CBD - Concise Bounded Description - Member Submission from Nokia Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 1 October 2004

• Re: Test cases Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: A few simple tests jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: draft XML query results format spec Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Dan Connolly
• UC&R ready for review Kendall Clark
• Re: more on FROM's necessity Kendall Clark
• Re: more on FROM's necessity Kendall Clark
• Re: more on FROM's necessity Seaborne, Andy
• Re: more on FROM's necessity Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement Steve Harris
• Re: FW: URI string substructure queries - labelling/filtering use case Kendall Clark
• more on FROM's necessity Kendall Clark
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement Kendall Clark
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement Kendall Clark
• SPARQL / Language spec ready for review Seaborne, Andy

Last message date: Thursday, 30 December 2004 16:55:49 UTC