- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:31:08 +0100
- CC: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>, DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Correction:
Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>
<snip/>
>
> I did the following with cwm from CVS:
>
> file:X.n3 -----------------------
> @prefix : <X#> .
> @prefix data: <http://example.org/data/> .
> @prefix log: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#> .
>
>
> { <file:D.n3> log:semantics ?g .
> ?g log:includes { data:a data:b data:c }
> } => { ?g a :graph } .
> -----------------------
> file:D.n3 -----------------------
> @prefix : <http://example.org/data/> .
>
> :a :b :c .
> -----------------------
>
> then used "cwm X.n3 --think" to get:
>
> which gives ( I put prefixes back and stripped out other stuff like the rule: )
>
> ( { data:a data:b data:c } ) a X:result .
>
> ?g is an N3 formula. Formulae (quoted graphs) are outside RDF (for better or
> worse - I'm not making a judgement).
>
That should be:
{ <file:D.n3> log:semantics ?g .
?g log:includes { data:a data:b data:c }
} => { ( ?g ) a :result } .
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I forgot to write out the emacs buffer.
Apologies,
Andy
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 16:31:32 UTC