- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:27:20 +0000
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Kendall Clark wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:48:17PM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > >>Kendall says the design is neutral to service-centric vs model-centric >>viewpoints, with multiple operations per service end point (SP) >>already. > > > Actually, I've been saying something weaker: I worked hard to try to > keep the design as neutral as possible. That was a primary design > goal. Not sure if I succeeded or not. Sorry to mischaracterise. Could say what it is saying that is weaker? I thought I had the widest characterisation that it allowed of service or model centric, and multiple or single operations per service access point (concrete protocol level). Andy
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 20:27:48 UTC