- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 01:46:47 +0000
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:14:53 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Steve Harris wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 02:50:36PM -0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0199.html > >> > >>>waiting for the editors to announce if there are any document changes. > >>>I don't actually see any decision in the last telcon minutes > >>> > >>> > >> > >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0210.html > >> > >>All three. Or just # (c.f. common in scripting languages). > > > > > >+1 for just # > > If you are happy with that, I propose just "#" for comments. > > In the telecon I thought you were making the case for /**/ comments. No, that may have been someone else. I'd like there to be one type, but I dont really care which. My feeling is still that fewer syntax variations make the language easier to learn. - Steve
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2004 01:46:53 UTC