- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:58:47 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-10-12T14:30Z for review Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0096.html IRC log: http://www.w3.org/2004/10/12-dawg-irc Scribe: Kendall Clark AGENDA 1. Convene, take roll, review record Present: Kendall Clark Dan Connolly Pat Hayes Andy Seaborne Kevin Wilkinson Simon Raboczi Eric Prud'hommeaux Janne Saarela Steve Harris Regrets: Dave Beckett, Jos De Roo, Howard Katz, Farrukh Najmi RESOLVED: to accept telecon meeting record 5 Oct 2004 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0053.html Next meeting 2004-10-19 14:30 UTC Regrets: Andy Seaborne (?) Chair: Dan Connolly Scribe: Simon Raboczi (Regrets for 26 October: Andy Seaborne) 2. Publication of SPARQL Draft has moved into W3C machinery, from which we hope some good information will escape soon. [Draft now published.] PatH -- technical problems in definitions, which have been addressed, but he hasn't re-engaged since then. AndyS would appreciate review of doc up to 4.3 -- post-pub review, that is. ACTION: PatH review SPARQL def'ns post-publication 3. Publish UC&R EricP has req'd pub from W3C team. Status for UC&R is that we think we are finished. No pending objectives or requirements, and editor would like to stop adding use cases SimonR: may have a use case for counting. PatH: DAML ql potential users wanted counting 4. SPARQL Protocol KendallC: protocol draft under furious work, should have something to show soonish -- for next week's meeting, ideally. 5. "Web Services Constraints and Capabilities" taken up [from DanC] EricP: attending the WS C&C workshop today; we anticipate a report from him next week. ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service constraints with respect to WS-Policy continues. 6. Issues List DanC: reformatted issues list from table to list 7. SOURCE SteveH: happy w/ amount of work re: SOURCE tests he's done so far; could do more later, if necessary ACTION: SteveH to turn his SOURCE tests into SPARQL ones ACTION SteveH: test cases (10 or so) re: current SOURCE design. -- COMPLETED ACTION AlbertoR: real test cases re: current SOURCE design. -- COMPLETED ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add more formal links, update the examples, try to think about extra constraints as EricP proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s only in in SELECT). Look at various people's source test cases. -- CONTINUES These actions CONTINUE: ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals' ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE' ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions' ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue ACTION DanC: talk with Kendall about issues list maintenance ACTION: Tom to send sample iTQL queries and result formats for subqueries vs. disjunction 8. Comments from SWBP&D WG Rest assured, we are doing something HTTP-based. 9. comment from P. Dawes DanC: we have some obligation to pay some attention to comments that come in from others. ACTION: AndyS formally respond to phil dawes's comment, closing that loop for now Also, note: Jeremy Carroll's comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Sep/0007.html We informally note that this input is interesting and it will be considered in due course RESOLVED: Adjourn
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 13:58:52 UTC