- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:27:56 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I once again pleaded that we postpone SOURCE 'till next time, and then took a straw poll which resulted in many "my users want source" responses. I'm still concerned that we won't find a SOURCE design that meets the needs of all these users, but I just thought of a way to manage that risk. Would each WG member who has talked to some users who want SOURCE please sketch a test case? I don't need you to get every detail right at the first draft, but if, say, Kevin knows some customer that wants SOURCE, I'd like our final test repository to have a test case that his users can point to and say "yes, that will work for us." If you can base your test case sketch on a little bit of *real data* from the users, that's great. If you have to simulate it with example.com and such, that's not as great, but it's still good. If one of the tests that Dave is already working on matches your users' usage patterns, I'd still prefer that you copy the pattern and substitute the real vocabularies and values and such that the users care about, but I suppose responses of the form... The pigfarmer supply chain consortium's usage of SOURCE is covered by an existing test http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/source-named/query-9.1.rq are more helpful than nothing. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 16:27:47 UTC