- From: Tom Adams <tom@tucanatech.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:52:39 -0500
- To: DAWG list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
>> <snip/> >> Hmm. Ok. I just don't think add/deleteTriples is that difficult to >> specify or test. Maybe I'm wrong. > > There is a major alternative to the add/deleteTriples operations in > the protocol which woudl be to extend the query langauge with an > update language (c.f. SQL). This has the advantage of working in the > local case as well. > > I see query as being more clear cut and doable for last call with the > query language. I'd argue for this one eventually. I'd like the query language to be as fully featured as possible, allowing all the operations, but this is too much work for a first release, and I'm biased. > <snip/> Cheers, Tom -- Tom Adams | Tucana Technologies, Inc. Support Engineer | Office: +1 703 871 5312 tom@tucanatech.com | Cell: +1 571 594 0847 http://www.tucanatech.com | Fax: +1 877 290 6687 ------------------------------------------------------
Received on Saturday, 20 November 2004 20:52:43 UTC