- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:34:19 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:50:26 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >I realise now that there are cases where this could be valid, such as > > > > PREFIX : <http://example.com/> > > CONSTRUCT (:foo :bar :baz) > > > >or > > > > SELECT 23 > > Steve, > > Currently, only variables and * are allowed in SELECT. Are you proposing a > change? (I don't see thing that stops it just at the moment.) No, I meant "could" as in "could with a different syntax", it would actually be pretty useless, you would probably need something like "SELECT 23 AS section", but I dont want that either. Maybe version 2 :) Its not very useful unless youre using UNION queries. I guess you could do "SELECT ?section WHERE ?section == 23", but I'l shut up now, as I think I'm just confusing the issue :) It was just an example of why I was wrong to assume that queries need data to produce results, in the general case. - Steve
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 11:34:23 UTC