- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
- To: jos.deroo@agfa.com
- cc: connolly@w3.org, Dave Beckett <Dave.Beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 jos.deroo@agfa.com wrote: > > find the +1/-1 idiom straightforward? > > I now do, but it took some time to grab it :) Note that in some/most (apache) communities the voting is not democratic but instead means: +1 in favour -and- I will spend time to make it happen and/or am comitted to help fixing it if it all goes wrong. +0 In favour - but not going to spend time on it. 0 not going to spend cycles on it - seems okish. -0 bad idea - but not going to spend cycles; please sit on your own blisters. But I am not going to do a 'told you so' later :-) -1 veto - and I am committed to soon post a detailed (technical) reason -and- I am committed to come with an alternative proposoal within a few days. Which I back and will make happen if it gets selected. Or in other words - a lot of skin in the game :-). And votes of people who do not honour the social contract loose their shine and gradually end up beeing ignored. Dw.
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2004 09:01:23 UTC