- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:23:49 -0500
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: kendall@monkeyfist.com, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 04:14:06PM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > >Because having something like the abstract protocol makes sense if > >someone's going to do anything other than HTTP. > > Fine - but that is not the same to me as a "must have" abstract protocol > (i.e. rec track, normative). A "being informed by" document (a note?) > could be fine. I don't yet have any reason to drop it from either draft. Just FYI. > There is more deployment experience with query than with update. We have > not undertaken a use case/requirements analysis for update so the balance > is "remote (read) access" now or a long wait for something grander. I'd > prefer to split up the part that is better understood - as you will have > gathered by now :-) Yes, and I agree re: deployment experience; but this is all orthogonal to non-HTTP protocols and the virtues of an abstract section. Or so it really seems to me. > >You've insisted that we drop getTriples, repeatedly. I don't, > >therefore, see the point of debating its details...Am I missing something? > > Yes! - two things > > 1/ My comment is directed at the use of "g=" being different in different > cases regardless of the agruement for or against getTriples. I was noting > that uses are different. Okay. > 2/ I am not insisting on dropping getTriples. I'm proposing that it is > handled for HTTP by "lang=getTriples" in the case of directing a request to > a service processor and the fact that "GET /graph" is a plain HTTP. I don't understand this *at all*. Maybe a phone call or something would help. Maybe I'm just in a Fat American pre-Thanksgiving Brain Haze... :> > >I don't agree; and I had different guidance from our chair. > > I had to read it to see where it was the same and where, if anywhere, it > was different or specialized. Give me (the reader) a clue that I can skip > it. Sure. > I have lots of details comments as well :-) Oh, my heart thrills at the prospects! :> Kendall
Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 16:24:51 UTC