- From: Tom Adams <tom@tucanatech.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:18:08 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi, I'm also OK with letting it out the door early. I haven't completed my review of the simplex, but from what I've read on this version and earlier ones I'm happy enough. Tom On 20/12/2004, at 10:14 PM, Kendall Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:21:50AM -0600, Dan Connolly muttered > something about: > >> >> 3. Protocol Spec >> >> http://monkeyfist.com/kendall/sparql-protocol-simplex/ >> >> ACTION: EricP to publish "SPARQL Protocol for RDF" pending approval >> from Kendall, TomA and AndyS >> >> for my edification, how manyof Kendall, TomA, and AndyS >> approve publication of what's there now, v 1.8 2004/12/06 19:22:10 ? >> Is it sufficiently clear how you'll get the ball thru all 3 >> of them, EricP? > > The latest version: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ > > where there is a version 1.1. This *is* the latest. > > I have to give potential regrets for tomorrow; I'm on vacation, though > I may > make it to the telcon. > > FWIW, I'm fine w/ publishing the version 1.1. It's got lots of holes, > but > Andy's right that early pub is a good thing. > > Kendall > > -- Tom Adams | Tucana Technologies, Inc. Support Engineer | Office: +1 703 871 5312 tom@tucanatech.com | Cell: +1 571 594 0847 http://www.tucanatech.com | Fax: +1 877 290 6687 ------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 14:18:16 UTC