- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:59:46 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:44:20PM -0500, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > RDF Data Access Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > Tuesday 2004-12-07 14:30-16:03 UTC > log: http://www.w3.org/2004/12/07-dawg-irc sorry, that's http://www.w3.org/2004/12/07-dawg-irc > Agenda: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0412.html > > chair: Dan Connolly > scribe: Eric Prud'hommeaux > > > 1. Convene, take roll, review agenda > > Attending: > Eric Prud'hommeaux > Dan Connolly > Simon Raboczi > Tom Adams > Steve Harris > Kendall Clark > Kevin Wilkinson > Andy Seaborne > Jos De Roo > > Regrets: > Alberto Reggiori > Howard Katz > Pat Hayes > Hiroyuki Sato > Dave Beckett (on IRC for a while) > Farrukh Najmi > Janne Saarela > > Next meeting: > Tuesday 2004-12-14 14:30-16:30 UTC > Scribe: TomA > > PROPOSED to accept as a true record of the last meeting: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0394.html > ACCEPTED without opposition > > ACTION: KendallC expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying > clients > CONTINUED > > > 2. ftf4 2005-01-19/2005-01-20 in Helsinki, Finland > > [DanC forwards mail to WG re what to wear in Finland] > 12 expected at the f2f. > > > 7. ftf5 in March 2005 > > DanC showed us the SWIG meeting at the 2005 tech plenary page > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SwigAtTp2005 > > ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March 28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days). Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week. > CONTINUES > > Kendall brought up the idea of meeting for 4 days. No audible strong > reactions. DanC can chair for 2 days. > > > 3. Test Cases > > ACTION JosD: write email about alternative result format using > DONE http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0415.html > > This raised a use/mention discussion. No discriminating use cases > found yet. DanBri has URI munging and regexp use cases. Andy proposes > <<uri>> in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0420.html > DanC will create an issue ala > ISSUE: use/mention issues in regex operators, test result format > > ACTION: SteveH is willing to adapt his testing infrastructure to > generate input/output RDF/XML and typed nodes into manifest file > CONTINUED > > ACTION EricP: make sure all dawg tests are world-readable now and > going forward > > ACTION EricP: come up with a specification for the "non-XML" syntax > (may be turtle) > > PROPOSED to accept use cases > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2-1a > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2-2a > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2-3a > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2-4a > RESOLVED with 1 abstention: Kendall Clark and no objections > > Simon, DanC raised a scalar constraints issue with "?price < 30" in ex 3 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-3 > SimonR: can you put scalar constraints in the graph? > AndyS: numeric ops allowed in scalar constraints ala "?price + 3 < ?x + ?y" > AndyS: What about op:lessThan "42"^^xsd:byte (0verloading) > This also raised issues of casting and round-tripping. > > ACTION: EricP to sketch tests around comparators in the graph > constraint > > ACTION SimonR: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax > uniform to graph constraints > > XSCH SWBPD task force is addressing XSD data types in RDF. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw/ > > DanC, SimonR, TomA and JosD don't like the scalar > constraints syntax. > > > 4. Protocol > > [discussing 26 Nov binding > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0364.html] > > A discussion of whether to publish the result format separately > sparked these issues: > should be RDF-friendly > schema users want predictable element and attribute names > vars could be listed at the head > The mood was in favor of a separate result format document. > > ACTION: DaveB to write an XML result format > > ACTION: AndyS to review Dave's XML result set format > > ACTION: SteveH to review Dave's XML result set format > > [discussion of simplex protocol document > http://monkeyfist.com/kendall/sparql-protocol-simplex/] > > PROPOSE that simplex be published pending approval from KendallC and TomA and AndyS > RESOLVED with 0 abstentions and 0 objections > > ACTION: KendallC to publish "SPARQL Protocol for RDF" pending approval from TomA and AndyS > > > 5. SPARQL SOURCE Issue > > c.f. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0426.html > > ACTION: DaveB update the dawg test repository to record or amend tests > to correspond to the > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0241.html > CONTINUED > > ACTION: TomA write email to list about how their customers are using > named graphs > DONE > > ACTION: JanneS propose text for hard failure in the protocol draft > CONTINUED > > ACTION: DanC suggest formal definitions for SOURCE > CONTINUED > > > 6. SPARQL update, issues > > ACTION: PatH to review editors working draft of rq23 > DONE > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0419.html > > ACTION: AlbertoR owns issue 'DESCRIBE' > DONE > > ACTION: DanC owner of issue 'yes or no questions' (pending protocol > doc) > CONTINUED > > ACTION: SteveH own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue > CONTINUED > > ACTION: EricP migrate some Algae UnionDisjunciton test cases > > [discussion of whether to publish early without PatH's feedback or > later with the feedback] > Mood in favor of publishing later with the feedback. > > > ADJOURNED at 16:03:29Z > -- > -eric > > office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA > cell: +1.857.222.5741 > > (eric@w3.org) > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than > email address distribution. -- -eric office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +1.857.222.5741 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 04:58:32 UTC