- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:28:02 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20041019142802.GC6743@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:12:44AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service > constraints with respect to WS-Policy continues. Nothing custom, but the last section of "RDF For Web Service Policy Assertions" [1] starts on it a bit. The problem is that the web services folks haven't worked out their desired expressivity. Proposals range from simple identification (logical operations are wrapped into a new identifier, ala FredzAuthentication ^ JoezReliableMessaging turns into MyAuthReliableMsg) to all of conjunction, disjunction, negation. ws-policy [2], a leading contender, recently struck negation and now offers conjunction and disjunction. ws-policy policies are compared for equivilence or subsumption by examining the disjunctive normal form of the policy expression. ala comparing policy1: FredzAuthentication ^ (JoezReliableMessaging v SuezTransactions) policy2: FredzAuthentication ^ SuezTransactions [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/08/20-ws-pol-pos/#query [2] http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws-polfram/ -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia) (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:28:03 UTC