- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:17:40 +0100
- To: Simon Raboczi <raboczi@tucanatech.com>
- Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Simon Raboczi wrote:
>>>(Section 11 and further tomorrow...)
>
>
> These are my final few comments. I support publishing the document as
> a WD.
>
> ===
>
> [[ 1.107 -- 11.2 Constructing an Output Graph
> The CONSTRUCT form returns an RDF graph specified by either a graph
> template or by "*". If a graph template is supplied...
> ]]
>
> "Graph template" should be "graph pattern", or should at least be
> defined to be the use of a graph pattern in this particular syntactic
> position.
Nack - it isn't a fully general "graph pattern" at this point:
1/ Its only a conjunctive pattern - no optionals, disjunctions, unsaids.
2/ It may also include bNodes as constants of the query.
This is an issue on the issue list.
So I prefer a new term. It will be better defined post-publication.
>
> ===
>
> [[ 1.107 -- A. SPARQL Grammar
> This grammar is defines the allowable constructs in a SPARQL query. ...
> ]]
>
> -is
v1.111
Done
>
> ===
>
> [[ 1.107 -- B. References
> [1] " Three Implementations of SquishQL, a Simple RDF Query Language",
> ]]
>
> Spurious space before the quote.
v 1.111
Done
>
> ===
>
Thanks for the comments
Andy
Received on Monday, 11 October 2004 12:17:58 UTC