- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:55:00 -0600
- To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 18:44 +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:56:32PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > > > > I've added the tests from > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0538.html > > > > As http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-001 > > > > I believe this completes my action from the 2004-12-21 telecon, assuming > > the translation is correct > > I've just read Andy's mail where he says UNSAID doesnt bind variables, > that seems quite supprising to me (and makes UNSAID less useful, but much > less painful to optimise), but I'l change the test to an ASK. I was a little surprised too about UNSAID not binding variables too, though it makes sense when I think about it. It seems worthwhile to keep that test around too. Please make a test out of the ASK and the SELECT. And please make a test ouf of the 1st case from 0538 too, i.e. the one that's not about UNSAID but about inference. > I dont think its possible to ask that question (all the things that aren't > of type :C2) without a binding UNSAID. Not that I think thats a bad thing > :) > > - Steve -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 19:54:29 UTC