- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:33:16 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > I'm going over the definitions, and in the case of... > > "Graph Pattern GP matches RDF graph G with substitution S if S(GP) is a > subgraph of G." > > I think entails is clearer: > > "Graph Pattern GP matches RDF graph G with substitution S if G > simply entails S(GP)." OK - done v1.139 Andy > > with simply entails linked to > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#defentail > > > p.s. a public comment asked > "which definition of subgraph does SPARQL use - the standard one from > graph > theory or the expansive one used in RDF semantics in the presence of bnode > relabelling?" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Oct/0003.html > > it's the one with relabelling. So subgraph is perhaps misleading. >
Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 16:34:36 UTC