- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:02:47 +0100
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Thanks for those Dave. I've fixed the mistake in section 2.4 Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Dave Beckett <> > Date: 19 October 2004 14:50 > > I needed more test cases to drive throw at the sparql support in my > application, so I took all the examples from sections 1-3 of > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20041012/ > and made them into a pile of tests with a manifest. > > There are only 4 actual tests since some of the data files etc.are > introductory > and have no data/query/result set. The files are named > ex<section><letter> for examples in some section, letter starting at > 'a'. > and suffix .rq for query, .n3 for data and -result.n3 for result. > > This did result in finding a bug/typo in the WD. In the query > in section 2.4, foaf:box should be foaf:mbox. > > I attach the files i ended up with. > > Dave
Received on Monday, 25 October 2004 13:03:22 UTC