- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:34:59 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:04:50 -0600 Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > I'm looking for issues we can close easily, and the name > thing seems pretty well settled: I'm getting pretty much > uniformly positive feedback on SPARQL. > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#languageProtocolName > > But people then ask "what does it stand for?" I've not heard many people ask for > I think the original proposal was > "Simple Protocol and RDF Query Language" > -- > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0500.html > > but we haven't propagated that expansion into the draft(s). It's in the <acronym> expansion in the sparql query document, part 1. How it appeared there was an editorial choice. > I propose that we do so. > > Hmm... what become of "ACTION EricP: set up a naming poll using WBS"? > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs#sec-abs > > I guess we dropped it somehow. It doesn't seem worthwhile to me. > Does anybody still want to do that? Since I came up with it, how about this: SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language since S=Simple isn't so true 1/2 :) Dave
Received on Saturday, 11 December 2004 00:35:34 UTC