- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:02:41 -0600
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:41:15PM -0600, Dan Connolly muttered something about: > When you moved the protocol WD from monkeyfist.com to w3.org > I expected these URIs to change as well: > > tag:monkeyfist.com,2004-10-13:/sparql-p/abstract/operation/query > > The vocabulary of operations is pretty clearly a namespace, > and W3C has a policy for namespace URIs > http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri > > EricP, I'm pretty sure you won't be able to publish without > fixing this. > > Then, since it's good practice* to make available a representation > of this namespace, and RDF is handy for describing resources, > we might as well use it to describe the abstract protocol, ala: > > @prefix p: <http://www.w3.org/2004/sparql/prot#>. > @prefix dt: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . > @prefix rdfs: ... > @prefix owl: ... > > p:getGraph > util:inputTypes ( > OperationPoint > [ owl:unionOf ( > owl:Nothing # optional > p:OperationTarget > p:OperationTargetSet > ) ] > ). > > > and so on. If this has to be done before pub'ing, it will have to wait till I done with holiday and back in DC. I will change the protocol URIs for sure. Not yet sure about using RDF in that way to describe. I still have to think a bit more about using the WSDL2 RDF mapping. But I agree in principle, FWIW. Kendall
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:02:43 UTC