- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:18:23 -0600
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 21:18:11 UTC
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 18:23 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#MultipleMatches 1.120 ) > Text added in v1.129 OK, but now there's some redundancy; the definition I gave for substituion is intended to replace the definitions of binding and set of bindings. These define pretty much the same construct: "A substitution S is a functional relation from variables to RDF terms. We write S[v] for the term that S pairs with the variable v." and "A binding is a pair which defines a mapping from a variable to an RDF Term. If B is such a binding, var(B) is the variable of the binding, and val(B) is the RDF term. ... A binding, B, defines a substitution subst(T, B) on triple T that replaces every occurrence of the variable, var(B), with the corresponding RDF Term, val(B)." I hope to have a suggestion about how to resolve the redundancy after I study the definitions for SOURCE (and perhaps optionals). -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 21:18:11 UTC