Re: Issue with the result set format

On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:52:48AM +0000, Seaborne, Andy muttered something about:

> >   <variables>
> >     <hpage/>
> >     <name/>
> >     <mbox/>
> >     <age/>
> >   </variables>
> That would do just fine.

I like that. I wonder, in cases where we know hpage is a resource (and thus
its value is really a URI) whether <hpage uri=""/> adds anything? Is it just
the variable names we need here, nothing about their types?

> I have been asking around as to the preferences of result1 vs result2 forms. 
> Not a scientific survey but I haven't come across any support for form 1, and 
> very quickly people pick on the lack of schema-checking on it.

Schema support is overrated, IMO. Especially in such a simple format.

Anyway, I vastly prefer form1 to form2.

Kendall Clark

Received on Friday, 26 November 2004 16:19:44 UTC