- From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:03:40 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
regrets for today's telecon - I am in Norway far away from a fix / cheap phone line till next monday Alberto On Nov 8, 2004, at 11:10 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > 1. Convene, take roll, review agenda > > RDF Data Access Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > Tuesday 2004-11-09 9:30am-11:30am/14:30-16:30 UTC > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") > supplementary IRC chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/11/09-dawg-irc > > scribe: Dave Beckett > regrets: Steve Harris at ISWC > > Next meeting: Tuesday 2004-11-16 at 14:30 UTC, > provided a chair and scribe emerge > regrets: DanC for 16 Nov, 23 Nov, 30 Nov > > PROPOSE: to accept as a true record: > > propose to continue these without discussion: > ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions' (pending protocol > doc) > ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE' > ACTION: SteveH is willing to adapt his testing infrastructure to > generate input/output RDF/XML and typed nodes into manifest file > > > 2. Use Cases > > ACTION Eric to ask Kendall to put X509 policy use case into UC&R > > done-ish: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ > 0205.html > > advice to the editor? > editor's inclination? > > > 3. ftf 4 > > 19-20 January 2005 Espoo, Finland > > Janne points to some directions and requests a registration form > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ > 0211.html > > > 4. ftf 5 > > ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March > 28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days). Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week. > some progress: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ > 0185.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ > 0144.html > > Note WBS form on tech plenary scheduling nightmare > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34786/TP05prep/results > > > 5. Protocol, Interoperability Demonstration Services > > A present for Guy Fawkes night Seaborne, Andy (Friday, 5 November) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ > 0220.html > and following > > ACTION KendallC: write a protocol document draft > > ACTION KendallC: expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying > clients > ETA before F2F4 > > > 6. SPARQL update, issues > > note progress in recent draft > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ v1.128 2004/11/08 15:27:14 > > ACTION EricP: supply definitions for SELECT (vars ordered or not?) ala > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ > 0151.html > > ACTION PatH review SPARQL def'ns post-publication > > ACTION: AndyS to write a test cases which use ? and $ in the same query > > Chair would like to talk about the public comments list a bit, > esp. re spreading the load. > > > 5. SOURCE Issue > > ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add more formal links, > update the examples, try to think about extra constraints as EricP > proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s only in in SELECT). Look at various > people's source test cases. > > progress: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ > 0241.html > > > 6. Disjunction issue > > ACTION Simon: explain how much of disjuction can be done with > optionals, nested or otherwise. > > Note I have accepted Steve's regrets, but these seem nearby: > > ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue > ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals' > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > - Alberto Reggiori, Senior Partner, R&D @Semantics S.R.L. alberto@asemantics.com www.asemantics.com Milan Office, milano@asemantics.com, +39 0332 667092
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 12:03:43 UTC