- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:24:18 +0000
- To: Hiroyuki Sato <sato.hiroyuki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Thanks for the comment. I have changed the data in the dataset as you suggest to make. I reformatted the example query as well. Andy Hiroyuki Sato wrote: > Regrests for today. I'm now at the place where I can’t use phones. > > I have been reviewing Live Draft of SPARQL Query Language for RDF. > > For the moment, I have one comment. > > In section 5 (Nested Patterns), at the second example of nested patterns, > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#NestedPatterns > it is better to add the following data to present example data. > _:b vcard:N _:z . > _:z vcard:Family "Hacker" . > Present query result will not be changed, but this example can show that > vcard data only having vcard:Family can’t match the present query. > > I think, even if using the following query, I can get present query result. > PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> > PREFIX vcard: <http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#> > SELECT ?foafName ?gname ?fname > WHERE ( ?x foaf:name ?foafName ) > [ ( ?x foaf:mbox ?mbox ) ] > [ ( ?x vcard:N ?vc ) [( ?vc vcard:Given ?gname )] > [ ( ?vc vcard:Family ?fname ) ] > ] >
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 16:24:36 UTC