- From: Hiroyuki Sato <sato.hiroyuki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:42:08 +0900
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Regrests for today. I'm now at the place where I can’t use phones.
I have been reviewing Live Draft of SPARQL Query Language for RDF.
For the moment, I have one comment.
In section 5 (Nested Patterns), at the second example of nested patterns,
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#NestedPatterns
it is better to add the following data to present example data.
_:b vcard:N _:z .
_:z vcard:Family "Hacker" .
Present query result will not be changed, but this example can show that
vcard data only having vcard:Family can’t match the present query.
I think, even if using the following query, I can get present query result.
PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>
PREFIX vcard: <http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#>
SELECT ?foafName ?gname ?fname
WHERE ( ?x foaf:name ?foafName )
[ ( ?x foaf:mbox ?mbox ) ]
[ ( ?x vcard:N ?vc ) [( ?vc vcard:Given ?gname )]
[ ( ?vc vcard:Family ?fname ) ]
]
--
Hiroyuki Sato <sato.hiroyuki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 14:41:48 UTC