- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:12:59 +0000
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:55:00 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 18:44 +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:56:32PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > > > > > > I've added the tests from > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0538.html > > > > > > As http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-001 > > > > > > I believe this completes my action from the 2004-12-21 telecon, assuming > > > the translation is correct > > > > I've just read Andy's mail where he says UNSAID doesnt bind variables, > > that seems quite supprising to me (and makes UNSAID less useful, but much > > less painful to optimise), but I'l change the test to an ASK. > > I was a little surprised too about UNSAID not binding variables too, > though it makes sense when I think about it. > It seems worthwhile to keep that test around too. OK, sure. FWIW, I'm not sure it does make sense, its a doable operation, its just very expensive in the general case. > Please make a test out of the ASK and the SELECT. > > And please make a test ouf of the 1st case from 0538 too, i.e. > the one that's not about UNSAID but about inference. I did, dawg-unsaid-001, its just confusingly named. dawg-unsaid-002 is the real UNSAID one. - Steve
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 11:13:03 UTC