Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset

On Nov 30, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:53:24AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
>> Just forwarding the message to the WG without analysis/comment
>> isn't as helpful. The bits were already available to everybody.

I gather Tom's msg was in reply to a request from the chair
during a telcon.

> Doesn't this assume that WG members follow the comments list? I don't
> know that that's true.

Whether a WG member follows the comments list or not, the
bits are available if they want to get them. The comments archive
is linked from the WG homepage.

> And, to defend Tom a bit more, this isn't "just another comment" from
> someone interested in our work. It's rather more delicate than that,
> IMO.
> Kendall Clark

Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:37:57 UTC