- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:43:40 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: andy.seaborne@hp.com, "Bebee, Bradley R." <BRADLEY.R.BEBEE@saic.com>, "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 09:10 -0500, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: >> Hum. I think that testing for protocol conformance would be part of a >> data access test suite ... but, let's focus on the other question: >> >> "Can DAWG deliver a test suite for the query language?" >> >> It seems that unless there is a means to constrain what inference may >> be performed in response to a query, that the behavior of the query >> processor can not be tested. > > Inference affects the input graph. Our tests state the input > graph explicitly. Given the input graph, the results of the > query are determined by the spec*. > > > * or... at least: I hope so; > the SOURCE designs seem to have multiple answers, and some > of the value testing designs do to; I sure hope we don't > choose those designs. hm.. design issues don't see it.. can they be made observable as a test? -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 22:44:18 UTC