public-prov-wg@w3.org from June 2012 by author

Curt Tilmes

• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)

Daniel Garijo

• Re: prov-wg telcon agenda June 28 2012 (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: blog posts on tutorial and F2f (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: contribution to prov-o narrative - please respond for tomorrow (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-381 (jzhao): Feedback and refactoring suggestion to prov-o section 3.2 [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-381 (jzhao): Feedback and refactoring suggestion to prov-o section 3.2 [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-409 (prov-dm-review-LC): feedback on PROV-DM document (for last call release) [prov-dm] (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-381 (jzhao): Feedback and refactoring suggestion to prov-o section 3.2 [PROV-O HTML] (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Teleconference today - regrets (Thursday, 7 June)

Eric Stephan

• Re: Forwarding a comment from SemTech... (Sunday, 10 June)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Regrets (was: prov-wg telcon agenda June 28 2012) (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: ISSUE-433: Can the protocol be decoupled from the service definition in prov-aq (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-434: Look at wadl or some other description language for the service - is it possible? do we have time? paq (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-433: Can the protocol be decoupled from the service definition in prov-aq (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-434: Look at wadl or some other description language for the service - is it possible? do we have time? paq (Monday, 25 June)
• Other uses for specializationOf (FYI) (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-435: "specialized entity" in specialization definition [prov-dm] (Sunday, 24 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-432 (post-or-get): Is http get the correct form for the provenance service [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-432 (post-or-get): Is http get the correct form for the provenance service [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-432 (post-or-get): Is http get the correct form for the provenance service [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: ACTION-92 (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-429 (hasAnchor-contextualization): how does hasAnchor relate to contextualization [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 21 June)
• ACTION-92 (was: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-06-14) (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 14 June 2012 (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-401 (ScopePruning): Exclude features for which consensus has not been found (Sunday, 10 June)
• Scope, consensus and muddy waters (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-399 (paq-relation-defs): Define relations in prov-aq in a technology independent way [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 8 June)
• Teleconference today - regrets (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-CONSTRAINTS - how can we know they're satisfied? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• PROV-CONSTRAINTS - how can we know they're satisfied? (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: ISSUE 384 comment. (Was: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31) (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: RDFa prov-o (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: RDFa prov-o (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Sunday, 3 June)
• ISSUE 384 comment. (Was: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31) (Sunday, 3 June)

Ivan Herman

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-436 (prov-datatypes): adopting data types from a given version of rdf (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-436 (prov-datatypes): adopting data types from a given version of rdf (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Forwarding a comment from SemTech... (Sunday, 10 June)
• Forwarding a comment from SemTech... (Sunday, 10 June)

James Cheney

• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-394: is alternateOf symmetric? [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 5 June)

Jim McCusker

• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-435: "specialized entity" in specialization definition [prov-dm] (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: ISSUE-434: Look at wadl or some other description language for the service - is it possible? do we have time? paq (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-432 (post-or-get): Is http get the correct form for the provenance service [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 1 June)

Jun Zhao

• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-381 (jzhao): Feedback and refactoring suggestion to prov-o section 3.2 [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-381 (jzhao): Feedback and refactoring suggestion to prov-o section 3.2 [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-391 (jzhao): Reflecting Membership in the Collection Component [prov-dm] (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Saturday, 2 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-379 (jzhao): Update provo html section 3.1 [PROV-O HTML] (Friday, 1 June)

Kai Eckert

• Re: Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) (Friday, 8 June)

Khalid Belhajjame

• Re: prov-o meeting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Other uses for specializationOf (FYI) (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-409 (prov-dm-review-LC): feedback on PROV-DM document (for last call release) [prov-dm] (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-409 (prov-dm-review-LC): feedback on PROV-DM document (for last call release) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 17 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-393: The properties prov:key and prov:value need to be replaced by prov:pairKey and prov:pairValue [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: reminder: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 4 June)

Luc Moreau

• Re: prov-wg: Important Last Call Reviewers + Vote + Minutes of June 28, 2012 Telcon (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-409 (prov-dm-review-LC): feedback on PROV-DM document (for last call release) [prov-dm] (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-436 (prov-datatypes): adopting data types from a given version of rdf (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-409 (prov-dm-review-LC): feedback on PROV-DM document (for last call release) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-435: "specialized entity" in specialization definition [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-435: "specialized entity" in specialization definition [prov-dm] (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: influence definition (Saturday, 23 June)
• influence definition (Saturday, 23 June)
• Re: ACTION-92 (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 21 June)
• F2F3 participants (Friday, 15 June)
• Re: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-06-14 (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-06-14 (Thursday, 14 June)
• prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-06-14 (Thursday, 14 June)
• copy of agenda (as wiki seems down) (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-391 (jzhao): Reflecting Membership in the Collection Component [prov-dm] (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 13 June)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 14 June 2012 (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Dictionary/Collection: where are we? (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 7 June)
• Dictionary/Collection: where are we? (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-391 (jzhao): Reflecting Membership in the Collection Component [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-CONSTRAINTS - how can we know they're satisfied? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-391 (jzhao): Reflecting Membership in the Collection Component [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-CONSTRAINTS - how can we know they're satisfied? (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Fwd: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Saturday, 2 June)
• Fwd: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Saturday, 2 June)
• Fwd: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Saturday, 2 June)
• Fwd: Definition of role (Saturday, 2 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31 (Friday, 1 June)
• prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31 (Friday, 1 June)

Miles, Simon

• External review (Friday, 29 June)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 12 June)
• RE: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 1 June)

Olaf Hartig

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-415 (concept ordering): reorder section 1.1 list of concepts [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 21 June)

Paolo Missier

• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Uses of PROV page (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-412 (pairkey-a-resource): should pairKey reference a resource instead of literal? [Ontology] (Tuesday, 19 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-401 (ScopePruning): Exclude features for which consensus has not been found (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness -> axioms (Saturday, 9 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Dictionary/Collection: where are we? (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)

Paul Groth

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology] (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] (Friday, 29 June)
• prov-wg: Important Last Call Reviewers + Vote + Minutes of June 28, 2012 Telcon (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: prov-wg telcon agenda June 28 2012 (Thursday, 28 June)
• prov-wg telcon agenda June 28 2012 (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Uses of PROV page (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: blog posts on tutorial and F2f (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: prov-o meeting (Tuesday, 26 June)
• blog posts on tutorial and F2f (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-434: Look at wadl or some other description language for the service - is it possible? do we have time? paq (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: ISSUE-433: Can the protocol be decoupled from the service definition in prov-aq (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-432 (post-or-get): Is http get the correct form for the provenance service [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 23 June)
• contribution to prov-o narrative - please respond for tomorrow (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-423 (multipleheaders): What does it mean to receive multiple headers? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Prov-WG June 7, 2012 telcon minutes (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Forwarding a comment from SemTech... (Sunday, 10 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• scribe?! (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Dictionary/Collection: where are we? (Thursday, 7 June)
• prov-wg: Telcon Agenda 7 June 2012 (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-349 (prov-o-html-egs): examples for each term in cross-reference section [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: base namespace prov.owl (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: owl file comments email (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: owl file comments email (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: base namespace prov.owl (Friday, 1 June)
• base namespace prov.owl (Friday, 1 June)
• owl file comments email (Friday, 1 June)

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

• PROV-ISSUE-439: Reference to dateTime in prov-n [prov-n] (Friday, 29 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n] (Friday, 29 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-437 (prov-dm-post-f2f3-review): Final review before last call vote [prov-dm] (Thursday, 28 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-436 (prov-datatypes): adopting data types from a given version of rdf (Wednesday, 27 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-435: "specialized entity" in specialization definition [prov-dm] (Saturday, 23 June)
• ISSUE-434: Look at wadl or some other description language for the service - is it possible? do we have time? paq (Saturday, 23 June)
• ISSUE-433: Can the protocol be decoupled from the service definition in prov-aq (Saturday, 23 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-432 (post-or-get): Is http get the correct form for the provenance service [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 23 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology] (Friday, 22 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-430: Primer should link to PAQ [Primer] (Friday, 22 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-429 (hasAnchor-contextualization): how does hasAnchor relate to contextualization [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-428 (mimetypes): should we define other mimetypes for other serializations? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-427 (multiple anchors): Section 3.2 clarify how multiple anchors should be treated [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-426 (arbitrary-data): Section 3.4 provides too much guidance [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-425 (service-description-rdf): Why does the service description need to be rdf? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-424 (summary-table): Table summarizing the usage of uris per access method [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-423 (multipleheaders): What does it mean to receive multiple headers? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-422 (balance-service-and-lookup): make sure that the two mechanisms two access provenance are presented equally [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-421 (consumer-producer): maker the roles explicit in the paq [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-420 (other-params): usage of other params in paq service description [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-419 (urlencoding): specification for url encoding [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-418 (sparql-service-example): add example in sparql using provenance-service-uri [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-417 (defs-of-verbs): provide definitions of the verbs used in prov-aq [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-416 (contentnegotiation): how does prov-aq work with content negotiation [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-415 (concept ordering): reorder section 1.1 list of concepts [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-414 (must-may-paq): Check usage of MUST & MAY in the paq [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] (Tuesday, 19 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-412 (pairkey-a-resource): should pairKey reference a resource instead of literal? [Ontology] (Tuesday, 19 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 19 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-410 (prov-primer-review): Feedback on Primer document [Primer] (Thursday, 14 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-409 (prov-dm-review-LC): feedback on PROV-DM document (for last call release) [prov-dm] (Thursday, 14 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-408 (prov-n-review-for-LC): feedback on PROV-N document (for last call release) [prov-n] (Thursday, 14 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 13 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-406 (delegation-direction): Direction of prov:Delegation is non-intuitive [Ontology] (Monday, 11 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-405 (Feedback_AI): Feedback on the mapping from Antoine Isaac (DC community) [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Saturday, 9 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-404 (Feedback_SS): Feedback on the mapping from Satya Sahoo [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Saturday, 9 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-403 (Feedback_TL): Feedback on the mapping from Tim Lebo [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Saturday, 9 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-402 (Feedback_SM): Feedback on the feedback from Simon Miles [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Saturday, 9 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-401 (ScopePruning): Exclude features for which consensus has not been found (Saturday, 9 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-400 (DistinguishExternalLinks): Links to external web pages/documents should be distinguished [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 8 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-399 (paq-relation-defs): Define relations in prov-aq in a technology independent way [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 7 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-397: Remove external <a> links in PAQ body; move to [REF] [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-394: is alternateOf symmetric? [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-393: The properties prov:key and prov:value need to be replaced by prov:pairKey and prov:pairValue [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 4 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-392: model hasProvenanceIn / isReferencedBy / isTopicOf in PROV-O [Ontology] (Sunday, 3 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-391 (jzhao): Reflecting Membership in the Collection Component [prov-dm] (Sunday, 3 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-390: Does PROV-O need to provide terms for PAQ? [Ontology] (Saturday, 2 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-389: existing prov-o extensions? [PROV-O HTML] (Saturday, 2 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-388 (tools-and-demos): tools and demos [PROV-O HTML] (Saturday, 2 June)
• PROV-ISSUE-387 (unique-generation): generation [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 1 June)

Reza B'Far (Oracle)

• Re: Forwarding a comment from SemTech... (Sunday, 10 June)

Satya Sahoo

• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: contribution to prov-o narrative - please respond for tomorrow (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 22 June)
• Re: Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) (Thursday, 7 June)

Stephan Zednik

• Re: Regrets (was: prov-wg telcon agenda June 28 2012) (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: prov-o meeting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] (Wednesday, 20 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: reminder: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-374 (member-membership-indirection): indirection for Dictionary members [Ontology] (Friday, 1 June)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)

Tim Lebo

• prov-o meeting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: Other uses for specializationOf (FYI) (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-399 (paq-relation-defs): Define relations in prov-aq in a technology independent way [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 8 June)

Timothy Lebo

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology] (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology] (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: blog posts on tutorial and F2f (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: prov-o meeting (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: blog posts on tutorial and F2f (Monday, 25 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-435: "specialized entity" in specialization definition [prov-dm] (Sunday, 24 June)
• reminder: prov-o meeting Monday (Monday, 18 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-391 (jzhao): Reflecting Membership in the Collection Component [prov-dm] (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 12 June)
• reminder: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (Friday, 8 June)
• prov-o assignments (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ACTION-91: comment regarding completeness (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: Changes to prov:Dictionary (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Changes to prov:Dictionary (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-CONSTRAINTS - how can we know they're satisfied? (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-390: Does PROV-O need to provide terms for PAQ? [Ontology] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-349 (prov-o-html-egs): examples for each term in cross-reference section [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-377 (rl-plus-plus-justify): All RL "violations" justified appendix [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-393: The properties prov:key and prov:value need to be replaced by prov:pairKey and prov:pairValue [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-395: Rename hadOriginalSource to "originatedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-394: is alternateOf symmetric? [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• prov:Dictionary example - without the specs (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 5 June)
• prov-o matrix (Tuesday, 5 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: reminder: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: reminder: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE 384 comment. (Was: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31) (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: reminder: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] (Monday, 4 June)
• reminder: prov-o telecon today (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-392: model hasProvenanceIn / isReferencedBy / isTopicOf in PROV-O [Ontology] (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Dublin Core - PROV Mapping, Call for Feedback (until June 5th) (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: RDFa prov-o (Sunday, 3 June)
• Re: call for feedback! Re: [owl changed] ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology (Saturday, 2 June)
• call for feedback! Re: [owl changed] ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology (Saturday, 2 June)
• RDFa prov-o (Saturday, 2 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: Definition of role (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: base namespace prov.owl (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: owl file comments email (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: base namespace prov.owl (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: owl file comments email (Friday, 1 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 1 June)

Tom De Nies

• Re: Regrets (was: prov-wg telcon agenda June 28 2012) (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-423 (multipleheaders): What does it mean to receive multiple headers? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 21 June)

Last message date: Friday, 29 June 2012 21:07:09 UTC