W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:06:36 -0400
Message-Id: <F4353E55-C335-490D-A78C-8280B277C7E8@rpi.edu>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Or perhaps "wasRevisedFrom" to suit the was* naming convention.

-Tim

On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/396
> 
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: prov-dm
> 
> DM editors,
> 
> Could wasRevisionOf be renamed to "revisedFrom" ?
> 
> I think it follows the "wasDerivedFrom" naming a little more closely.
> 
> The Involvement "Revision" (and qualfiedRevision) could remain the same.
> 
> I think that this naming is a little more natural.
> 
> (yes, this is phrased in terms of PROV-O, but an issue on DM; probably best product would be mapping prov-dm <->  prov-o...)
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 03:07:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC