W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:19:16 +0100
Message-ID: <4FEB0854.5040500@ncl.ac.uk>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
CC: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Luc

seems a very straightforward solution (although as I recall it took a long time to converge on this).

Should this still be at risk?

--Paolo

   On 6/27/12 10:49 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> All,
>
> At the face to face meeting, we have agreed to rename contextualization and mark this feature
> at risk.  Tim, Stephan, Paul and I have worked a solution that we now share with the working group.
>
> Given that contextualization was already defined as a kind of specialization, we now allow an optional
> bundle argument in the specialization relation.  (Hence, no need to create a new concept!)
>
> See section 5.5.1 in the current Editor's draft
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-specialization
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Luc
>
> PS. Tracker, this is ISSUE-385
>


-- 
-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 13:19:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC