W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:35:46 -0400
Message-Id: <58CF78EE-0CB6-4446-9CBD-5E5B13B7F5C1@rpi.edu>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
So, was "wasRevisedFrom" a no brainer acceptance?

Thanks,
Tim


On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:06 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> Or perhaps "wasRevisedFrom" to suit the was* naming convention.
> 
> -Tim
> 
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
>> PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/396
>> 
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: prov-dm
>> 
>> DM editors,
>> 
>> Could wasRevisionOf be renamed to "revisedFrom" ?
>> 
>> I think it follows the "wasDerivedFrom" naming a little more closely.
>> 
>> The Involvement "Revision" (and qualfiedRevision) could remain the same.
>> 
>> I think that this naming is a little more natural.
>> 
>> (yes, this is phrased in terms of PROV-O, but an issue on DM; probably best product would be mapping prov-dm <->  prov-o...)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 20:36:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC