- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:02:09 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? It is (and IMO should be) unspecified. It's primary purpose is not to be used as a referent in a provenance trace, so we shouldn't make it conform to provenance constraints. If it's appropriate to make a particular instance of a ProvenanceService also be a prov:SoftwareAgent, then that's not prohibited. But I think a subclassOf claim is unnecessary and too strong. #g -- On 05/06/2012 21:00, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/398 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance > > PAQ editors, > > Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > >
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 20:39:48 UTC