W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: prov-o meeting

From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:22:18 -0600
Cc: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1F14F921-B187-4A4D-AE9A-BE3AFE9AC5FB@rpi.edu>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Hi Tim,

During the call today I summarized the ontology changes from F2F3  and the group discussed how to proceed with divvying up the prov-o narration work.

The titanpad for the meeting is at http://titanpad.com/QjpAA1md9K

We decided to use a google doc spreadsheet to organize the narration work in the same manner we used one for the prov-o property/class examples.

The spreadsheet will list the author and reviewer for each section that needs narration.  Jun has offered to help setup that document.

There was a question about the granularity of narration, and the granularity that we separate the work at.

Will we define an author for every sub-section (e.g. 3.2, 4.3), or for every term (e.g. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html#Entity) ?
3. The PROV-O Ontology Description
3.1 Starting Point Terms
3.2 Expanded Terms
3.3 Qualified Terms
3.4 Collections Terms
4. Cross reference for PROV-O classes and properties
4.1 Starting Point Terms
4.2 Expanded Terms
4.3 Qualified Terms
4.4 Collection Terms
Due to the document organization, It seems most natural to define an author for each section in section 3.  For Section 4 we are not sure.

When we have decided at what level of granularity to narration and split the narration workload and have the document online, members of the WG can volunteer by putting their name in the spreadsheet as author of a given section.  Sections with no volunteers will be assigned.  Sections most in need of narration will be labeled in the spreadsheet.

--Stephan

On Jun 25, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> No worries. Sorry for the inconvenience today.
> I'm back home now, but heading out for more travel tomorrow.
> I will be contacting the group members individually after I do some work on my end.
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Khalid Belhajjame wrote:
> 
>> Hi Tim,
>> 
>> Sorry for not being of help, as I literally just arrived to Manchester.
>> 
>> khalid
>> 
>> On 25 June 2012 11:56, Tim Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> Prov-o,
>> 
>> I have not yet made it back home from Santa Barbara and will be in the air during our weekly 12pm EDT call today.
>> 
>> @stephan or @khalid, could you run the meeting? It would be good to summarize the changes to the ontology from the F2F. I will make the changes to the owl file.
>> 
>> Per the F2F, we need to farm out the narrative to ensure coverage of all terms. So, we need a list of those missing and their assignees. I can do this tonight or tomorrow and can contact members individually when that is done.
>> 
>> The wiki page also enumerates everything outstanding in the usual way.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
> 
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 21:23:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC