- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:49:21 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org WG" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|50e65c6f1e094da057c77a12d54e2933o55EnP08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FCF5FE1>
Hi Tim, It's specifically your last point. Being to express whether membership was complete was a request from Stian and Paolo I believe. Luc On 06/06/2012 02:31 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Luc, > > On Jun 6, 2012, at 12:48 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > >> >> >> On 5 Jun 2012, at 23:18, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu >> <mailto:lebot@rpi.edu>> wrote: >> >>> prov-wg (and prov-dm editors), >>> >>> I've reviewed all of the materials (that I can find) regarding >>> collective concerns about prov:Dictionary, and >>> have committed changes to the latest PROV-O owl and html to address >>> those concerns: >>> >>> * https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html >>> * >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl >>> >>> The changes are summarized here: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/index.php?title=Eg-34-us-supreme-court-membership&oldid=7905#PROV-O_changes_made.2C_inspired_by_this_example >>> <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/index.php?title=Eg-34-us-supreme-court-membership&oldid=7905#PROV-O_changes_made.2C_inspired_by_this_example> >>> >>> and repeated here: >>> >>> * Added class prov:Collection, as subclass of Entity >>> * Added property prov:hadMember domain prov:Collection range >>> prov:Entity. >>> o This supports both generic "simple set" prov:Collection >>> and prov:Dictionary. >>> * Made KeyValuePair a subclass of Entity >>> o this follows from Set Collection |:c >>> prov:hadMember :my_member| and the definition of >>> Collection "A collection is an entity that has some >>> members. The members are themselves entities"). >>> * Renamed prov:membership to prov:qualifiedMembership to follow >>> qualification pattern naming. >>> * prov:Membership became subclass of prov:EntityInvolvement >>> (though, it could become subclass of >>> prov:KeyValuePairInvolvement, itself a subclass of >>> prov:EntityInvolvement. But we'll try to simplify and reuse >>> prov:entity) >>> * prov:member renamed to prov:pair and became a subproperty of >>> prov:involvee >>> * Added property chain (qualifiedMembership o prov:pair) >>> rdfs:subClassOf prov:hadMember >>> * Added prov:removed domain prov:Removal range prov:KeyValuePair >>> * Removed prov:CompleteDictionary from DM and PROV-O. >>> >> Why? >> Luc > > > What in particular would you like to discuss. > As I said, this reflects a response to many concerns that have been > raised by many people in many forms. > In an effort to maintain focus and to make progress, I recommend that > these points, the latest prov-dm, and the latest prov-o update serve > as the basis for these discussions. > > -Tim > > >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> You'll notice the prov-o modeling of Dictionaries is not consistent >>> with latest prov-dm. >>> >>> The prov-o team would like to ask the prov-dm editors to reconsider >>> how collections and dictionaries are defined, so that they reflect >>> the latest prov-o modeling of the PROV concepts. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim Lebo >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> cc tracker ISSUE-374 ISSUE-391 > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 13:50:09 UTC