- From: Graham Klyne <gklyne@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:58:41 +0100
- To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>,public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ba5f5825-8962-438b-b778-030ec76149f1@email.android.com>
I'd say that's for the group/chairs to decide. I raised the issue to make the option explicit and process-visible for the currently-running discussion points. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk> wrote: Graham, this seems sensible if not automatic, but what do you mean my "timely"? For example, for my part I am working actively to try and iron out all remaining issues on collections. What's my deadline? Cheers, -Paolo On 6/9/12 1:32 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-401 (ScopePruning): Exclude features for which consensus has not been found > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/401 > > Raised by: Graham Klyne > On product: > > In the absence of timely consensus, do not include collections and/or > contextualization of provenance in the current round of specifications. > > See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Jun/0248.html > > > > > -- ----------- ~oo~ -------------- Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, UK http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Sunday, 10 June 2012 07:59:40 UTC