- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:19:01 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Oh...stylish.... Paul On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Paul and Daniel, > > Have a look at the latest prov-dm document. All definitions are now > marked by a diamond. > > Thoughts? > Luc > > On 13/06/12 19:54, Paul Groth wrote: >> I think the solution would be the glossary we have discussed. >> >> A diamond at the end would also not be bad. >> >> cheers >> Paul >> >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> Hi again, >>> >>> It's a problem with all the definitions, not just this one. >>> >>> Could we have suggestions please? >>> >>> Is the solution to make the term clickable as Daniel suggests, but then what >>> the difference between >>> the usage of the term and the definition, since both may be clickable. >>> >>> Is it to follow the word by a clickable symbol (e.g. diamond or dagger)? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Luc >>> >>> >>> On 06/13/2012 05:05 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote: >>> >>> Hi Luc, >>> thanks for the link. >>> How do I know that that is the link by just looking at the document? Imagine >>> that I am a new user and I want >>> to reference the definition. How do I infer the link you have just sent me? >>> I can't see it in the table of contents. >>> >>> Maybe making the word "provenance" clickable? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Daniel >>> >>> 2012/6/13 Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >>> >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> There is a link: >>>> >>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-provenance >>>> >>>> Luc >>>> >>>> >>>> On 06/13/2012 04:53 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>>> >>>>> PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/407 >>>>> >>>>> Raised by: Daniel Garijo >>>>> On product: prov-dm >>>>> >>>>> Regarding the latest draft, I found difficult to reference the definition >>>>> of provenance that we have in PROV. It is in the introduction, yes, but >>>>> could we have a separated section just for stating what the definition of >>>>> provenance is? >>>>> >>>>> I am asking for something like we had in the incubator: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/What_Is_Provenance#A_Working_Definition_of_Provenance >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Daniel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Professor Luc Moreau >>>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Professor Luc Moreau >>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>> >> >> >> -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 21:19:31 UTC