W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm]

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:19:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRoR0r1f10CCRK6uQfX6v11t85ByoDtdPgJD0LpR1=0Rvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Oh...stylish....

Paul

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Paul and Daniel,
>
> Have a look at the latest prov-dm document. All definitions are now
> marked by a diamond.
>
> Thoughts?
> Luc
>
> On 13/06/12 19:54, Paul Groth wrote:
>> I think the solution would be the glossary we have discussed.
>>
>> A diamond at the end would also not be bad.
>>
>> cheers
>> Paul
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> It's a problem with all the definitions, not just this one.
>>>
>>> Could we have suggestions please?
>>>
>>> Is the solution to make the term clickable as Daniel suggests, but then what
>>> the difference between
>>> the usage of the term and the definition, since both may be clickable.
>>>
>>> Is it to follow the word by a clickable  symbol (e.g. diamond or dagger)?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Luc
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/13/2012 05:05 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Luc,
>>> thanks for the link.
>>> How do I know that that is the link by just looking at the document? Imagine
>>> that I am a new user and I want
>>> to reference the definition. How do I infer the link you have just sent me?
>>> I can't see it in the table of contents.
>>>
>>> Maybe making the word "provenance" clickable?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> 2012/6/13 Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> There is a link:
>>>>
>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-provenance
>>>>
>>>> Luc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/13/2012 04:53 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm]
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/407
>>>>>
>>>>> Raised by: Daniel Garijo
>>>>> On product: prov-dm
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding the latest draft, I found difficult to reference the definition
>>>>> of provenance that we have in PROV. It is in the introduction, yes, but
>>>>> could we have a separated section just for stating what the definition of
>>>>> provenance is?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am asking for something like we had in the incubator:
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/What_Is_Provenance#A_Working_Definition_of_Provenance
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>
>>
>>
>>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 21:19:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC