W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology]

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:00:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRrZ_YY36Nhog2RuopNt3MkPyK+sve6pPp-9LNRispHBbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I don't think there are in properties in the dm itself that are
defined as such...

Paul

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> Before I take out all property characteristics in prov-o, should _any_ stay?
>
> e.g., should the properties stay asymmetric and irreflexive?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 22, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/431
>>
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: Ontology
>>
>> Need to remove the OWL properties that reflect the prov-constraints, since we are only reflecting prov-dm.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 21:01:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC