W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:26:10 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|667ebba2b03f9adbd95044e876f9994do5R9QB08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FEC1522.10904@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
CC: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi James,

I was wondering about your notion of "normal attributes" and the notion 
of "underlying Thing".
The use case we discuss, where a piece of software (rating tool) reads 
some provenance and,
with application-specific reasoning, rates entities blurs the distinction.

In the example:

     agent(tool:Bob-2011-11-16, [perf:rating="good"])  // this is the 
rated agent
     specializationOf(tool:Bob-2011-11-16, ex:Bob, ex:run1)  // or 

The rated agent tool:Bob-2011-11-16 is generated after the tool has 
processed the contents of ex:run1.
In that case, the syntax, by this I mean the bundle, is part of the 

Isn't this inevitable with "online uses" of provenance, where processing 
of provenance helps
makes decisions in the application domain?


On 06/28/2012 04:35 AM, James Cheney wrote:
> I don't view the property "being described in bundle b" as the same 
> kind of attribute as normal attributes - to me, attributes describe 
> properties of the underlying Thing, in the semantics, not properties 
> of the entities describing the Thing in the syntax.  Of course, not 
> all of us believe in Things.
> One can easily get paradoxes by blurring this distinction [1].

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 08:26:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC