W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:50:46 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|37522139fad3847d09fa1170ff8cd515o5CLpC08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FD8FD26.5060104@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
CC: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Paul and Daniel,

Have a look at the latest prov-dm document. All definitions are now 
marked by a diamond.

Thoughts?
Luc

On 13/06/12 19:54, Paul Groth wrote:
> I think the solution would be the glossary we have discussed.
>
> A diamond at the end would also not be bad.
>
> cheers
> Paul
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>    
>> Hi again,
>>
>> It's a problem with all the definitions, not just this one.
>>
>> Could we have suggestions please?
>>
>> Is the solution to make the term clickable as Daniel suggests, but then what
>> the difference between
>> the usage of the term and the definition, since both may be clickable.
>>
>> Is it to follow the word by a clickable  symbol (e.g. diamond or dagger)?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Luc
>>
>>
>> On 06/13/2012 05:05 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Luc,
>> thanks for the link.
>> How do I know that that is the link by just looking at the document? Imagine
>> that I am a new user and I want
>> to reference the definition. How do I infer the link you have just sent me?
>> I can't see it in the table of contents.
>>
>> Maybe making the word "provenance" clickable?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>
>> 2012/6/13 Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>>      
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> There is a link:
>>>
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-provenance
>>>
>>> Luc
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/13/2012 04:53 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>        
>>>> PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm]
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/407
>>>>
>>>> Raised by: Daniel Garijo
>>>> On product: prov-dm
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the latest draft, I found difficult to reference the definition
>>>> of provenance that we have in PROV. It is in the introduction, yes, but
>>>> could we have a separated section just for stating what the definition of
>>>> provenance is?
>>>>
>>>> I am asking for something like we had in the incubator:
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/What_Is_Provenance#A_Working_Definition_of_Provenance
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>> --
>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>
>> --
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>      
>
>
>    
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 20:53:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC