- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:38:12 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Other description languages are possible, and can be implemented. If anyone really wants this, I'd suggest writing it up as a separate note. Otherwise I think we'll run out of time, as it will be hard to know where to draw the boundary. #g -- On 23/06/2012 20:10, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > ISSUE-434: Look at wadl or some other description language for the service - is it possible? do we have time? paq > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/434 > > Raised by: > On product: > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 10:46:45 UTC