W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ISSUE-434: Look at wadl or some other description language for the service - is it possible? do we have time? paq

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:38:12 +0100
Message-ID: <4FE83F94.30002@ninebynine.org>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
CC: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Other description languages are possible, and can be implemented.  If anyone 
really wants this, I'd suggest writing it up as a separate note.  Otherwise I 
think we'll run out of time, as it will be hard to know where to draw the boundary.

#g
--

On 23/06/2012 20:10, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> ISSUE-434: Look at wadl or some other description language for the service - is it possible? do we have time? paq
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/434
>
> Raised by:
> On product:
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 10:46:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC