W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: prov:Dictionary example - without the specs

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:16:58 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|2d0d03c740d24b887ff9dd6e67724d60o54LII08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FCE693A.3040407@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim,

For information, I have committed another example with collections:

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-36-collection-of-prov-specifications

It shows how the collection of specs produced by the prov-wg evolves.

Cheers,
Luc

PS. The example is one of the use case driving the discussion on 
contextualization: currently, the vizualization attributes
are directly embedded in the entities, but this is not good practice.

On 05/06/2012 06:25, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> prov-wg,
>
> I tried my hand at modeling the provenance of the U.S. Supreme Court's current membership, and its derivation to it's first membership.
>
> The wiki page for the example is at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-34-us-supreme-court-membership
>
> In an attempt to take a fresh look at how we're modeling dictionaries (and collections?), I didn't reference PROV-DM, PROV-O, or any other examples or documentation -- I just tried to describe the subject matter.
>
>
> How does it look?
>
> I'd like to move PROV-O (and DM, if it needs tweaking) towards this kind of modeling and naming.
>
> Discussion and feedback encouraged.
>
> Later today, I'll try to start from scratch on the DM and work through the current PROV-O modeling, and then the recent threads on this topic.
> I hope by then we can converge on a satisfactory design.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>    
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:18:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC