- From: Tim Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:51:05 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 8, 2012, at 16:46, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > Eg? Unlike PROV-DM, etc., PROV-AQ is fundamentally *not* technology independent - it is 100% based in web technology. I think that to pretend that PROV-AQ relationships are technology independent would inappropriate. > +1 Tim > #g > -- > > On 07/06/2012 12:02, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-399 (paq-relation-defs): Define relations in prov-aq in a technology independent way [Accessing and Querying Provenance] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/399 >> >> Raised by: Paul Groth >> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance >> >> Currently, the relations and other terminology are defined in an rdf specific manner. These should be revised to be technology independent. >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 21:51:37 UTC