- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:06:39 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Jun 29, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > I don't think there are in properties in the dm itself that are > defined as such… Thanks for verifying. I'll strip them out. -Tim > > Paul > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >> Before I take out all property characteristics in prov-o, should _any_ stay? >> >> e.g., should the properties stay asymmetric and irreflexive? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 22, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >>> PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/431 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: Ontology >>> >>> Need to remove the OWL properties that reflect the prov-constraints, since we are only reflecting prov-dm. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group > Artificial Intelligence Section > Department of Computer Science > VU University Amsterdam >
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 21:07:09 UTC