W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:06:39 -0400
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DE33D84E-7A10-4566-AEF1-391BFDD8070D@rpi.edu>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>

On Jun 29, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Paul Groth wrote:

> I don't think there are in properties in the dm itself that are
> defined as such…

Thanks for verifying. I'll strip them out.

-Tim

> 
> Paul
> 
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> Before I take out all property characteristics in prov-o, should _any_ stay?
>> 
>> e.g., should the properties stay asymmetric and irreflexive?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 22, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> 
>>> PROV-ISSUE-431 (prov-o-only-dm): prov-o to suit prov-dm, not prov-constraints [Ontology]
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/431
>>> 
>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>>> On product: Ontology
>>> 
>>> Need to remove the OWL properties that reflect the prov-constraints, since we are only reflecting prov-dm.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
> Artificial Intelligence Section
> Department of Computer Science
> VU University Amsterdam
> 
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 21:07:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC