- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:39:11 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org WG" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Without EmptyCollection or CompleteMembership the collections/dictionaries are of almost no worth to my use cases, as all I can say then is that "some of the members are X, Y and Z" - but there might also be A, B and C. In Taverna workflows, all collections are closed (unless you export provenance before a workflow has finished). It is important to know that ALL these genes - and no other genes - came back. Just saying "some of these came back" is of less value. I understand that in RDF if we don't use rdf:List, then statements of such completeness are still fairly vague as the lists are not terminated and additional tuples could be adding members/insertions/removals. However when I make a provenance export of a workflow run, I would want to also say something like "These are all the workflow processes that ran, and these are all the entities that were created". But perhaps a more general completeness-claim for an account/bundle is out of scope for PROV. However, I still don't undertstand what is the problem with saying something is an empty collection. On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > It's specifically your last point. Being to express whether membership was complete > was a request from Stian and Paolo I believe. > > Luc > > > On 06/06/2012 02:31 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > > Luc, > > On Jun 6, 2012, at 12:48 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > > > On 5 Jun 2012, at 23:18, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > > prov-wg (and prov-dm editors), > > I've reviewed all of the materials (that I can find) regarding collective concerns about prov:Dictionary, and > have committed changes to the latest PROV-O owl and html to address those concerns: > > * https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html > * http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl > > The changes are summarized here: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/index.php?title=Eg-34-us-supreme-court-membership&oldid=7905#PROV-O_changes_made.2C_inspired_by_this_example > > and repeated here: > > Added class prov:Collection, as subclass of Entity > Added property prov:hadMember domain prov:Collection range prov:Entity. > > This supports both generic "simple set" prov:Collection and prov:Dictionary. > > Made KeyValuePair a subclass of Entity > > this follows from Set Collection :c prov:hadMember :my_member and the definition of Collection "A collection is an entity that has some members. The members are themselves entities"). > > Renamed prov:membership to prov:qualifiedMembership to follow qualification pattern naming. > prov:Membership became subclass of prov:EntityInvolvement (though, it could become subclass of prov:KeyValuePairInvolvement, itself a subclass of prov:EntityInvolvement. But we'll try to simplify and reuse prov:entity) > prov:member renamed to prov:pair and became a subproperty of prov:involvee > Added property chain (qualifiedMembership o prov:pair) rdfs:subClassOf prov:hadMember > Added prov:removed domain prov:Removal range prov:KeyValuePair > Removed prov:CompleteDictionary from DM and PROV-O. > > Why? > Luc > > > > What in particular would you like to discuss. > As I said, this reflects a response to many concerns that have been raised by many people in many forms. > In an effort to maintain focus and to make progress, I recommend that these points, the latest prov-dm, and the latest prov-o update serve as the basis for these discussions. > > -Tim > > > > > > > > You'll notice the prov-o modeling of Dictionaries is not consistent with latest prov-dm. > > The prov-o team would like to ask the prov-dm editors to reconsider how collections and dictionaries are defined, so that they reflect the latest prov-o modeling of the PROV concepts. > > Regards, > Tim Lebo > > > > > > cc tracker ISSUE-374 ISSUE-391 > > > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 14:40:01 UTC